It would help users who type in access codes incorrectly if the system gave an error message rather than just returning to the same screen. Without an error message, they don't know they have the code wrong.

Before moving to an online system, we allowed a 6-page total application length. Applicants could use the 6 pages how they chose, giving long answers to some questions and short answers to others as long as they didn't exceed total length. We want that same functionality online with a TOTAL character count per process, instead of an answer-by-answer character count.

We do not use the Application Evaluation Module. We would like the ability to hide this from our Dashboard.

We have evaluators that email our applicants outside of Foundant and then copy and paste it into their evaluation. It would be useful if we had the ability to be able to choose if we would like the staff evaluator to have the ability to email through Foundant.

It would be nice if you and organization has two evaluations that evaluator 1 and 2 can see each others evaluations in the side by side. Right now they can only see LOI and Application.

to set a limit on the number of selections an applicant can choose.
ie: applicants can select a maximum of a certain number of choices.

It would be helpful if a report could include uploaded request documents. We have to upload a source document to every grant request, so we want to be able to run a report to identify any requests missing a document.

We noticed that when an applicant adds a third-party e-mail address and then composes e-mail, the third-party receives an e-mail from "administrator" (of the site) (or in our case, my name) versus the name of the applicant. I would suggest the applicant be able to add their e-mail address as the "from" as well as the third-party e-mail address as the "to."

As part of our due diligence, we verify that all applicants have completed a specific, required process. Data from the specific process is also needed in evaluating requests from multiple processes.

Use cases:
Comparing year over year funding to an organization to determine other processes that may be useful to share with an applicant organization

Verifying that a required process has been completed for our due diligence process

Not only do we need an SLM Idea Lab but my Evaluators would like to see the details of the scholarships, and they can't! Nowhere on their Dashboard are they able to see the short description of the Scholarships that they will be reading for. They can only access via our Compendium. Let's get on that!

Is there a way to limit the viewing capabilities of the Board members or other evaluators other than Administrators in seeing Archived Processes? I wish that the Admin was the only one who could view the archived processes. I see this as an opportunity for Board members and other evaluators to get lost in old processes while looking for current info. Thanks!

When making questions in forms, it would be helpful to be able to move the dialogue box that pops up in order to read information on the form behind it. I am frequently wanting to see the wording of other questions on the form while developing new questions. I work around this by printing the question list as PDF but it would be easier to just be able to move the box. Thanks for considering.

So this probably only occurred to me because I just copied a follow up TEN times... not sure many folks will have encountered this. In any case, when you create a follow up, there are six automatic email selections to decide on (even if "not using" is your decision). I found it tedious to have to select the six emails ten times (sixty drop-down menus), so I was wondering if it would be possible when copying a follow up, to have the automatic email selections default to the original follow up's selections?