1052 results found
-
Ability to set Organization as Inactive
Similar to users, it would be helpful to have the ability to set Organization as "Inactive" Some of our organizations have now closed their doors, and there isn't a way for use to remove those organizations from mailing lists reports. We do add the user's status, though, if we could take those out right away it would be very helpful.
6 votes -
Assign Follow-Ups for Evaluation/Review
Please can we be given the ability to assign follow-ups for review/evaluation to other team members. It would be super helpful if we could do this within the system.
12 votes -
Randomly Assign Evaluators
In our process each applicant receives at least three reviews from three different evaluators. It would be nice if I could randomly assign evaluators to the applicants. I currently do this by creating an excel file with the applicants on the vertical axis and the evaluators on the horizontal. I assign each applicant a number and use a random number generator to assign the applications each reviewer is expected to review. To be able to do this quickly within the GLM system would be great. I know some of the competitors provide this option.
24 votes -
Date idea lab entries
I would like to see how old an idea lab entry is. Can you please show the date it was created? TCF
4 votes -
GLM/SLM Syncing to CSuite - Add Manual Profile Match Option
When syncing GLM/SLM profiles, CSuite attempts to match and link them by suggesting one or more possible matches. If CSuite does not suggest a match, the only current option is to create a new profile. Many times, a matching profile does exist in CSuite, but with a different version of the first name (Will instead of William) or a different email address (personal email versus school/work email).
Please add the option to look up and manually enter a CSuite profile ID when syncing GLM/SLM profiles.
6 votes -
Thoughts on Renewable Scholarships
As a scholarship admin, I want a way to communicate with students about the renewal requirements for an opportunity within the system.
- can do with email types, but it requires lots of manual workAs a scholarship admin, I want to remove the human review of follow-up forms to verify renewal eligibility.
I want to set rules for if a follow-up should be marked complete and if they don't does it kick back to draft, email the students, etc.
Examples of eligibility criteria for renewal
- GPA
- School
- Major5 votes -
Sequential & Open Submission Logic
Follow Up Submission Logic setting:
Instead of the sitewide setting of every Process being set for Follow Ups to either be submitted in Open or Sequential order, can this setting be available on the Process level? This would allow us to have some processes that allow open submission and other processes to require sequential submission.
(#FoundantSummit2022 session group idea)
Resubmitted original idea by Lacey Matney Sortman11 votes -
Date auto format
Please allow a date to auto format when entering without dashes. For example, entering 080225 will automatically change to 08/02/2025. This happens in CSuite but not in GLM.
Thank you. TCF
14 votes -
AI Summary
I would love an option to batch generate AI Summaries from the dashboard. I have 65 grants right now for my spring grant cycle, and rather than individually clicking into every form to generate a summary, it would save me a lot of time in my workflow to batch generate and then go in and copy over!
19 votes -
Sync comments between GLM and C-Suite
Would be awesome if we could have nonprofit comments in GLM synced to the nonprofit profiles in C-Suite so my team and I are always on the same page. Thanks!
10 votes -
Add ability to edit the subject line for email notification
Could we please add the ability to edit the subject line of the email notification? This would allow us to include a French translation where needed.
10 votes -
Public Fund Name
I have noticed in multiple template field lists that the use of the Fund Public Name is not an available option. To not have the Public Name available for all templates that have the Fund Name option defeats the purpose of the Public Name. It would be nice if the Public name was the default name used on templates or at least an option on all templates.
9 votes -
Pop-up message
It would be nice to have an option for an editable pop-up message that applicants would see once they are logged in (similar to the landing page message, but something they would have to notice and would see only once they log in). It could be used to notify applicants of any changes to the process or, really, anything that seems important.
3 votes -
Prevent Duplicate Applications in SLM
Bumping this back to the top of the list - please strongly consider only allowing one application per process to be started at a time within a process cycle.
When we have multiple processes running (for us it just increased again this year, in the 30s) and 550+ active applications, we need a better way to keep the numbers accurate and moving things through the process clean and as efficient as we can. Please limit them to one application start within a process and change the apply button within the tiles that match to them to "Continue" if they've started…16 votes -
Enhance the Candid API Integration
Enhance the Candid API Integration
- Reduce Nonprofit Application Burden
- Improve Funder's Collaboration PotentialThe Vision:
Imagine nonprofits applying for grants by simply entering their EIN, then watching most of their application auto-populate with organization, programmatic, demographic, and impact data from Candid's database. No more asking nonprofits to repeatedly enter the same basic information across multiple applications!Imagine funders receiving better data from applicant nonprofits. And also having an easier ability to share funder grantmaking data out to the field. (By having a standard export in Foundant of data coded for submission to Candid's annual eGrants reporting.) Funders would…
4 votes -
Scoring Questions - Optional or Weighted
I was wondering if anyone would find value in the ability to weight evaluation questions. We are exploring the idea of funding general operating requests and project-based requests, all from one process. If we were able to weight questions or make some scoring questions optional, this would prevent and help us with our evaluation of LOIs and Applications.
8 votes -
applied button
The "applied (with check mark)" is confusing our grantees. Grantees can make multiple applications to the same process. They have no idea that "Applied" means they have the correct application submitted. Can you change "Applied" to "Apply". The following page warns them of duplicates anyway. Why confuse things.
3 votes -
GLM: Block new application if grant report isn't complete
Block new application from applicant who hasn't completed a grant report on a previous grant award. This would encourage applicants to complete their grant report and provide another level of due diligence built into GLM
85 votesThank you for the idea.
Would you hope this is implemented across all processes?
-
k.morris@mhjf.org
When creating a merge doc, it would be convenient to be able to access the choice box for .pdf or .doc at the top of the merge template list, rather than having to scroll to the bottom of the list to make that choice.
4 votes -
Spelling/Grammar Check Tool in SLM Scholarship Applications
It would be helpful for SLM to include a spelling/grammar check tool within the scholarship applications for students to use when writing their essays or short answer responses. I know that some internet browsers have a spell check included, but it might be helpful from the student side to have a more comprehensive tool to help with spelling, grammar, etc. as they write their responses.
32 votes
- Don't see your idea?