Teachers are the grantees. The arts and science venues and bus transportation companies are key vendors and partners. We'd like to communicate with all parties concerned to deliver an awesome experience when awarding our grants.

We don't call it an "LOI" and it doesn't operate like one. We'd prefer it to be listed as a "Preliminary Application" or something else. Would be a nice feature if possible.

We have our reviewers look at follow up reports from awarded applications. It would be helpful if the "staff evaluator" role could have the ability to review follow ups

We would like the option to to Rank Order applications during Evaluation in lieu of giving a percentage score. For example, if there are 30 applications, only 1 application is given #1, one application #2 and so on. This option would be much easier for our Reviewers. In some cases, it is their preferred method of scoring.

Keep it simple. SORT SORT SORT, should be a simple click of the header and not MANUALLY sort. Good grief!

I'd like to see new tutorials for the SLM process. The current ones often use screens from GLM (organization vs user language...)

It would be helpful to allow Admins to submit for an applicant. We have instances of students/nonprofits completing their application but not hitting the submit button before the deadline. It is cumbersome to change the deadline for that applicant, proxy in as them (or have them sign in) to click submit. It's especially time intensive for SLM UA where a student has multiple opportunities, and therefore, multiple places where a deadline would need to be changes.

Similarly to reverting an application status, it would be nice to be able to progress an application from the admin side.

Would it be possible to change the payment tracker thumbs up/thumbs down to something else, maybe like the Sync Approved Toggle Button? Or change the color - green for approved, gray for unapproved? Right now scrolling through trying to find a few installments that haven't been approved is like looking for a needle in a haystack.

When syncing grantees from GLM in CSuite, we get an error when an organization spells out their State name in their organizational address instead of using the 2 letter abbreviation required in CSuite. The entries into the State should be limited to 2 characters, or add a note in the field description that indicates that they should use the abbreviation. This would save a lot of time and frustration when processing grants in CSuite.

Add under the Search button, and check number option.

There should a simple beginner's guide to using FOUNDANT.

Using Google Suite for instance. Customers are the people using the software and it should be user-friendly. We do not work for FOUNDANT it works for us. Customers should not have to create their own SOP's because the program is that complex.

In the reviewer dashboard, put some sort of column heading over the exclamation point to signify that they must click there to access/fill out the form. Many of our reviewers did not watch the provided video tutorial and were only clicking the project link to view only form.

I would like the ability to export a date driven list of sent emails to a spreadsheet. Or filter by recipient and export that list.

Many grant-making organizations have applicants submit reports on outcomes and take the time to have evaluators review the outcomes. There should be a much easier workflow for this- especially for larger processes

It would be great to be able to upload a copy of the check (or other payment document) at the time of installment payment. Currently, the only area to upload payment copies is in the Documents section on the request.

Change the text in the payment field from "Check #" to something more general like "Payment ID #" or allow it to be customizable.

Organizations are using less checks and more wire payments these days.

This would not be between ALL evaluators in a process and would be automatic so that grant administrators would not have to download evaluations and reupload to shared documents.