Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 50 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Michele and Pele,

    Thank you both for your thoughts full feedback. We have heard this request before, and are looking at how we can make the follow accessibility and editing easier for applicants.

    Do you believe increasing font size would be enough? Or do you have other thoughts on how to make this stand out to your applicants?

    Best
    Sammie

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 56 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Consideration  ·  22 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Meg,

    Thanks for your feedback. I think in the original design we really expected people to Process or Request and not be using them both in one site. However, you explain makes a lot of sense.

    I think there is room for us to play with how these two tools can play with each other in the filtered view and the org hierarchy chart.

    As we look at this functionality I may reach out.
    Best
    sammie

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Mirella,

    Thank you for your feedback!
    For now, I want to offer a work-a-round in that you can give you grants managers a dual role to accomplish them being able to the evaluator. While in the long run, we need to move Grants Managers into an evaluator option. Today if you give your Grants Manager that and the Staff Evaluator role they should be able to accomplish all you wish.

    If you reach out to your CSM they can talk you through this.

    That said I will work to keep this thread updated as to when you will not need this work-a-round to achieve your goals.

    Best
    sammie

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 55 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 64 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Consideration  ·  52 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 89 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    56 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Debbie,

    This is something we’ve discussed internally. Our idea at this point is to allow administrators, within an organization’s record, to added comments coded as different types of communication (such as phone call, in person visit, email), etc. This would not be int he same section as the current comments are, but it would be more of a communication-manager.

    That said, we haven’t gone into a lot of detail with this yet. If you have more detail you could add to your suggestion, I’d be grateful to get a better idea of what you have in mind.

    Thanks,
    -chris

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 99 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Consideration  ·  28 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 31 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Everyone,

    Thank for your feedback around columns and formulas in application.

    I would love a little more information:
    1) do you need all of the data in table type question to be available in reporting OR would you want things like the total to be flagged and only those cartain fields be reportable?

    2) what is the average size of these table 3×12 for examples?

    Thanks for your thoughts as we considering implementing this into the solution.

    Sammie

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 53 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base