Chuck
My feedback
-
2 votesChuck
shared this idea
·
-
23 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
7 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
-
63 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
-
58 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chuck
commented
We are still struggling with this. When applicants update their organization address, the address for the primary contact stays the same, so letters (and checks) can be sent to the old address.I suggest allowing applicants to update the addresses for anyone at their organization.
Chuck
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
HI Eliza,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Follow up visibility is something we will be look at understanding in the coming months.As we look at this more I may reach out with additional questions or ideas of what we are hoping to do.
Best
sammieAn error occurred while saving the comment Chuck
commented
The default should be to allow grantees to submit their next follow up (even if the prior one has not been marked complete yet.)
Chuck
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
-
49 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
Hi All,
just wanted to give an update that batch approval is still on our radar as added functionality to GLM.
Best
SammieChuck
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Chuck
commented
Would love to have this feature!
-
57 votes
Mariah,
Thank you for weighing in on the other side of this suggestions.
Do you want to control adding people OR if there was an email to the site administrator when a change was made would this be helpful in your situation?thanks
sammieChuck
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Chuck
commented
Pretty sure this is a feature you can ask support to turn on
-
1 voteChuck
shared this idea
·
-
22 votes
Hi All,
Merged to similar ideas together so we can see the discussion in one spot.While we have heard this in the idea lab and in multiple user groups and you fly, we buys I believe we still have some outstanding questions before this hit the GLM roadmap.
1) Is this on the request or organization level or both?
2) would you want to limit the number of documents someone could upload, labeling specifically what needs to be uploaded? A concern that we have heard in the past is just an open upload area might be filtered with clutter, thoughts on that?
3) Do they need due dates/expiration dates? How will you know they a still current?Thoughts are just a couple thoughts I have right off the bat. Thanks for helping to continue the conversation.
SammieChuck
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Hi Minerva,
Thank you for your suggestion.
We have recently been discussing the idea of adding task items to GLM.
These could be actions to assign to yourself or other users in the systems. This seems like it would accomplish what you are looking for but would love to hear more feedback from you and others.
Thanks
-chrisChuck
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Hi Everyone,
Would love some additional insight on this item.
When are you notifying student:
-Deadline approaching
-Decisions
-Reminders for upcoming follow upsAm I missing any other times?
For those of you who use a service already would you mind sharing the name
Thanks
-SammieChuck
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesChuck
supported this idea
·
-
87 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chuck
commented
Hoping this update will include the ability to batch export file uploads to PDF.
thanks,
ChuckChuck
supported this idea
·
As long as there is security for self adds (so people can't add themselves without an access code or some kind of authorization), self-adding would save time for us.