3 results found
-
Enhance Dynamic Field Visibility Control with “Exclude Types” Option and Extended Branch Support
I would like to propose two enhancements to the Dynamic Field Visibility Control feature to improve flexibility and support more complex configurations:
1.Add “Exclude Types” Option:
Introduce the ability to define specific types for which a field should be hidden. This will allow administrators to configure visibility rules more efficiently by excluding certain types rather than relying solely on inclusion criteria, reducing setup complexity and improving usability.2.Extend Branch-Level Support Beyond 6 Levels:
Currently, Dynamic Field Visibility Control does not function as expected when configurations exceed 6 branches (e.g., at the 7th level). Enhancing the system to support more than…2 votesNot Planned ·
AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
We are not planning to add additional levels. If you provide more insight to the justification, this may help understand your requirements.
-
Add “Exclude Grant Types” Option for Activity Availability
We propose adding an “Exclude Grant Types” option under Activity Permissions and Availability. Currently, the “Available to Grant Types” field allows administrators to select which grant types an activity applies to, but many of our activities are relevant to nearly all grant types except one or two. Selecting every applicable grant type individually is time-consuming and inefficient given the large number of grant types we manage. An Exclude Grant Types field would allow us to simply select the exceptions, automatically making the activity available to all other grant types. This would save time, reduce administrative effort, and improve accuracy when…
1 voteNot Planned ·
AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
Add exclusion rule will create additional complexity we are not planning for.
-
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?