Skip to content

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

933 results found

  1. While we are shifting to the use of post by payment in CSuite and will now be entering the "full award" amount for our multi-year or semester scholarships, we understood that it would only display that semester's installment amount as tied to the follow-up form for the upcoming semester. Instead, it's still displaying the entire award amount to the student which causes confusion for them. I understand it's possible to now add other shared fields into the form to pull 'installment 1, 2, 3, etc.' but that is going to require me to build additional forms based on year or…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Follow Ups  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. I would love an option to batch generate AI Summaries from the dashboard in SLM. We have hundreds of applicants that create thousands of applications, this would be a great asset so we do not have to open each application to select this. Great time saver.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Batch  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Year-end receipts - When we print year-end receipts for donors in bulk, it would be very helpful to be able to export the file as a Word file, rather than only as a PDF. Word is so much easier for editing page ends, in the event the donor has a long list of donations. Thank you!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Merge Docs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. This could already be an option, but often grantees and applicants have to request that documents be deleted since they do not have the option to do so themselves.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. For the most part, One Row Per Request gives us everything we want, but it squishes all the Forms (Approval, Agreements, Interim Reports, Final Reports) into one cell.

    The system is capable of separating each Form into its own Row; I wish it could separate them into Columns.

    Am I underestimating how computationally complex it would be for the system to do One Row Per Thing AND One Column Per Other Thing at the same time?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. I want to be able to edit two processes side by side without having to go back and forth.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. The logo sizing on the mobile login pages for GLM/SLM seems to be synced to the sizing on a web browser. This can make the logo look overly large and not be uniform with the text fields and text on the login page. Custom sizing would be great!

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. I would like to be able to task where it would go into a pool system where staff could accept or take tasks.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  CRM  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Please bring back the ability to pop out the chat window from the webpage. The revision to the chat prohibits the ability to detach the chat window from the webpage and move it across the screen so its viewable while working in GLM. It now disappears when continuing to work or look at forms to answer support staff questions.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  1 comment  ·  UI/UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Have 2 Score Fields in Reporting - one for LOI Evaluation Scores, and one for Grant Application Evaluation Scores. For Example, this would eliminate the need to filter out the scores when creating Reports for a process that has an LOI (because the current "Score" field combines the scores of the LOI and the Grant Application). Once the grant applications move onto the Evaluation stage, Board Members prefer scoring on the grant application because it's more current, and for Foundations like ours, we conduct in-person site visits, and Board Members are completing the Application Evaluations based on our site visit…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. It would be helpful to have an "alternative organization name" field that would automatically be searched when searching for an organization by name. This would be usefull when an organization has had a name change or has multiple names. Thanks!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. I would like to be able to add and remove buckets from the Open Requests section of the administrator dashboard. I have two different application processes, and I would like to quickly and easily see statuses for both of them on the dashboard, instead of having to click into application statuses, apply a filter to view one process, and then change the filter to view the other process.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. This was briefly touched on before https://idealab.foundant.com/forums/339786-glm-slm-idea-lab/suggestions/16809247-filterable-search-results-in-idea-lab

    after doing a search in idea lab it would be helpful to be able to narrow down the search instead of having to go through many pages of answers. Being able to filter by status at minimum.

    tagging and filtering by product would also be helpful

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. (submitting on behalf of a user)

    In the new organization summary view, users can view the cards for an org's users. On these cards, in addition to name, title, email, and phone number, there is a field for comments about that user. Currently, if there are no comments, it says "none" here. Feedback from a user would prefer this to be blank to indicate an absence of data, rather than showing "none" which implies an intentional lack of comment.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  UI/UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Hi. I think a good idea would be to add another automated email option after the evaluator does his/her evaluation. It would be nice for the administrator (me) to get notified that the evaluator has finished the evaluation. Thank you.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. I don't know if there is another way to do this, but the last time this suggestion was posed, only one person voted and it got Archived. :(

    What I want to see, is; if an Organization has a name change, that we can still find the organization by the old name. We update the Org. name ourselves (it is in lock down from Applicants/Contacts) and we add into the Sort Name with the new name and then (Formely: Old Org Name). My imagination tells me that we use to be able to search by Sort Name as well, but…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  1 comment  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. We have some fund holders that are working to grow their funds and would like to have their fund balance public.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Why not add Amount Requested to the new Organization Summary page along with the the Closed (previous) commitments.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi Mark, Thank you for the feedback. The one tricky part about requested amount is that it is a custom field and not a system field in 2026 we may be looking at how we can create more system fields, or creating coding that would help us know what fields are similar across clients to use in scenarios like this.


    -The Foundant Team

  19. Support Hub needs better documentation re: Print Packets
    https://support.foundant.com/hc/en-us/articles/4404567826071-Print-Packets
    Please detail the logic about question view-ability and how they are reflected in different print packets. Nothing is mentioned on this page about Print Packets for Follow-Ups. Apparently question view-ability is reflected differently in Application packets and Follow-Up print packets. at least according to a support chat that I had.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. For the organizational summary page, it would be helpful to distinguish between open and closed grants. For example, when viewing a grantee with multiple grants, the summary currently shows all requests—even those that are closed. Displaying only open requests in the summary would make it easier to see active items at a glance. If users want to review closed requests, they can click the ‘View’ button.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?