Skip to content
← IDEA LAB

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. Evaluating Follow-up submissions

    79 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  57 comments  ·  GLM & SLM Idea Lab » Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Petersen commented  · 

    I'm just joining this thread now but this has become one of our main challenges as we move through our granting cycles with Foundant. Lacking an ability to effectively evaluate followups is a glaring gap in the GLM process. We do a great job of receiving and analyzing applications, but if we are not able to effectively evaluate followups, I feel we are not doing our jobs well as philanthropists.

    Our work-around solution is similar to others - we have previously uploaded pdfs to Shared Documents for our evaluators to read and review. But it is a very clunky process.

    My respectful request is to please introduce the ability to evaluate followups which are linked to the original grant application. It would make our process move much smoother.

    Gratefully,

    Mark Petersen
    Bridgeway Foundation
    Canada

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Petersen commented  · 

    This is a high priority for us. I am hopeful we can also assign our evaluators as reviewers of followups. Our purpose is not to approve/deny them, but just to be able to view the report back from the organization on the activity the reviewers initially approved. I think it is essential that the circle is completed and our reviewers can see the results of their approvals.