Skip to content

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Katherine commented  · 

    Hi Chris,

    Thanks for following up. To be honest, this isn't a priority for us either ... it was one of those ideas that made sense at the time but less so now that I'm more familiar with how our grantees & team use the system.

    If it were to happen, the sort of documents that I had in mind were a handful of things like our assessment tools and resource guides - nothing that would amount to particularly large file sizes.

    -K

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Katherine commented  · 

    Would anyone else find it helpful if organizations/grantees could have access to Shared Documents in addition to Staff & Board Members?

    We have certain documents and resources that are shared with all of our grantees once their applications are approved, so I was thinking that Shared Documents would be a great way of making sure the most up to date versions of those common (not organization-specific) documents are easily accessible.

  2. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Katherine commented  · 

    Hey Chris,

    Of the 3 scenarios you outlined, either the first or the third would be ideal. I'd give the first a slight edge over the third because the formatting of the print packet would be preferable to a .xls or .csv file. In either case, it certainly wouldn't be a problem that it'd be an all or nothing kind of export.

    For all that I'd originally said any kind of export functionality would be great, the more that I think about it, I can't see how it'd work well (or even be that useful) as part of the data exports. At least for our purposes, the comments are very useful when we're reading up on each individual organization but wouldn't be one of the elements that we needed to look at in the aggregate.

    On an only marginally related note, the one thing better than exportable comments would be comments with rich text formatting!!

    Thanks,
    -Katherine

    Katherine shared this idea  ·