Settings and activity
28 results found
-
100 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Rachael
supported this idea
·
-
162 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rachael
commented
The current follow-up assignment and review process is a bit restrictive. If the follow-up can only have 1 assigned person and that in turn is not assignable to an internal review process I am not understanding the system functionality and logic. If an applicant turns something in at follow-up point I would think all grantees would want a linked review and approval to this process.
-
29 votesRachael
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesRachael
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesRachael
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesRachael
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesRachael
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rachael
commented
I am a new user coming from a different record system that had a pre-application and final application record. I really like the idea of listing everything in 1 area. I also think that we should have the ability to move certain documents that are considered "applicant final" version, into our follow-up record. This would make for a complete application record and 1 stop for what administrator's compile/view for the final application.
We are very much in favor of this idea. Having an evaluation at the follow-up stage is sound grants management practice. Having the documentation all in one place makes sense from an efficiency and audit perspective too.