Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathalie Lowenthal-Savy shared this idea  · 
  2. 94 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathalie Lowenthal-Savy supported this idea  · 
  3. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nathalie Lowenthal-Savy commented  · 

    In addition to OP's reason for posting, having a Secondary in addition to Primary contact option would be helpful when a grantee organization has two co-leaders (we have several atm). Without a Secondary option, the second co-leader is omitted not only from system reports but also from the document/grant agreement generator, and thus tactlessly omitted from grant agreements.

    Nathalie Lowenthal-Savy supported this idea  ·