25 results found
-
Export custom field list with visibility permission settings
The ability to export the custom field list from L1, L2 or L3, users, orgs or any system object, with settings such as mandatory toggle, description, select values, and including the role, status, and type permission settings, into Excel, or the ability to build a report builder report where you can customize the settings to be exported. The system design summary pulls some of this data into a word table format, which can be copied into Excel, but it is cumbersome and only copies from the core fieldset. Being able to export directly and easily from the custom field list…
17 votesMonitoring Interest ·
AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
We see the value and need to provide a way for customers to have a documented view of their system. We will monitor to see how much others are interested.
-
Record Lock Override Notification
When a user is being kicked out of a record, it would be great if they were notified that they were being kicked out.
35 votes -
T2P Projects: filter assigned users
In the T2P project when you are going to assign users the system should display Global Admin users who have User Access. Nowadays system shows all Global Admin users (with or without User Access).
4 votes -
SmartFields - change default to Exclude (or allow us to choose our preferred default for our system)
Can there be a way to choose your system's preferred default for SmartField inclusion? Currently it defaults to Include. Ideally we'd much rather it default to Exclude, or at least give us the option to choose our default.
The issue is that with numerous system admins making changes or adding fields over time, we inevitably are forgetting to toggle this to Exclude and errant fields then show up in our exported pdf files - that we often are completely unaware of. This could cause a file to being shared with users who should not have access to some of the…
18 votes -
Enhancements to the T2P Tool
After our first experience with the new T2P tool, we would like to suggest the implementation of the following enhancements:
- Pagination in "Changes Logged Against This Project"
The current page to view, select and manage the changes lacks pagination. This makes navigating large sets of changes difficult, especially when we need to manually select or unselect hundreds of changes.
Pagination would significantly improve usability and efficiency.
- Promoted indicator should be tied to ENVIRONMENT
We have noted several that the current behaviour is not ideal. The main suggestions would be:
--> The Promoted field should reflect the status of that change…8 votesWe plan to review pagination, search, and filtering capabilities within the T2P tool. If versioning is not being promoted, it should be reported as a defect to support.
-
See record version history
We would like to know the record version history. In the past we were able to do this by report, using the Audit Log data set but nowadays this option is not visible.
We would like to know the person who change the version and when (by record).3 votes -
The ability to batch update Notes
It is possible to batch update for status, institutions, associated contacts (etc), but it is not possible to do it on Notes.
Is there something I am overlooking? :)
6 votesFeedback Needed ·AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
@Emil - sorry for the delay, can you provide examples of use cases where you need to batch update notes? Thanks
-
User Groups
It would be nice for non system administrator user to be able to edit the profiles that are selected in the User Groups function.
1 voteFeedback Needed ·AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
Can you expand on the use case? We've enhanced contact association interface which will allow the user to perform bulk assignment.
-
Custom Fields Permission Quick Edit - freeze top/left headers for Role and Status; add in field Caption
When we need to update the custom field permissions, the Permission Quick Edit is often unusable. Once you scroll down a small amount, you lose the header row and can't tell what role or status you're changing. Same for when you scroll to the right, you lose the Custom Field column on the far left and have no idea what field you're editing.
We also usually don't really know the field's name as well as we know the Caption. It would be so helpful to include both the name and caption for reference so you know you're really updating the…
15 votes -
Dynamic Visibility should copy over to new System Versions
Currently, when SmartVersioning is used, it will copy over all the fields in the Core version to the new version. It does not, however, copy over the dynamic visibility. So if the dynamic visibility changes between versions, you have to manually keep all of your dynamic visibilities updated to the newest versions. This is a pain when you have to manage dozens of dynamic visibility fields.
It would make more sense that, if a dynamic visibility is set to the Core version, that it automatically adds the new version that is stamped from the Core. If fore some reason this…
11 votes -
Managing removal of uploaded files
For 'Upload - Multiple Files Storage' where Disable Delete is toggled on, allow System Admin to delete/remove uploaded files (incorrectly uploaded by user) without needing to toggle off Disable Delete across all users.
5 votes -
Ability to Copy/Save As SmartVersions
We build funding applications using SmartVersions. Sometimes we have a minor update to a SmartVersion we would like to make for a future competition but want to keep the original SmartVersion as well. It would be great if we could Copy or Save As a SmartVersion the same way you can Copy or Save As a Custom Field so we don't have to start from scratch each time.
13 votes -
Give the option to just run a Charity Check report through the GuideStar extension, rather than it pulling the entire "Pro" report
A recent SmartSimple update included a change with the GuideStar Charity Check feature, where it now pulls a GuideStar Pro report versus just pulling the Charity Check report. I'm not sure if it's just us or if there are any other clients have found this to be burdensome to their processes for a couple of reasons.
1) It now takes so much longer for the report to be pulled into the record (at least 5-10 minutes). So, it's not as immediate as it once was.
2) We don't use all of the other information that is in the Pro report.…
9 votes -
Add Deny View Version feature in Dynamic Field Visibility Control
Add Deny View Version feature for Dynamic Field Visibility Control field (see attached file).
Currently we have to remind which DFVC fields we have and if there is a condition in version feature every time we set up a new submission manager version. This is vey annoying because we have a lot of DFVC (more than 100) and we need to check one by one to add the new version.4 votes -
Report management
Improve the list view in the reporting module so that the listview is more like the advanced search list views on UTAs and can be configured locally. It should allow sorting and filtering on whether export is enabled, Category, UTA association etc
1 vote -
Permission Quick Edit: Security Matrix checkboxes for Fields
It would be really helpful to have the option in the various Security Matrix sections to toggle all the checkboxes on or off across for a particular field, not just down for a Role or Status.
And as we can do with the 3 dots in the header row to "Copy Row Settings", I'd like to be able to "Copy Field Settings".
Use Case: I have a similar update I'd like to make to a large number of new fields to remove all the current permissions and replace with updated permissions and need to go through each field and each…
9 votesMonitoring Interest ·AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
We will monitor interest for future consideration.
-
Version comparison report
To quickly compare field differences between two versions of fields in a UTA for a specific level (L1 or L2): Be able to generate a list/report/printout that lists only the fields where there is difference between the two versions. Bonus if it includes what the difference is. This would be kind of like the "Diff" button on custom fields, but it would provide a list only of the fields where there is a difference.
4 votes -
Allow edits to standard message template
We have received user feedback that the standard system message sent when a user is tagged in a Note is difficult to read. Users want italics or quotes to visually distinguish the Note content from the rest of the message. Users would also like the URL to be a clickable link so they can navigate to the Note directly from their email. If SmartSimple cannot update the standard system message, provide the ability to configure a custom template here (without creating a new workflow, which is what Support suggested).
1 voteFeedback Needed ·AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
Can you provide an example and call out the specific items that make it difficult to read? Thanks
-
Map Advanced Data Tables - Static Sections
When a static section is required in an advanced data table, clients still want to be able to query the data across records. While technically they can in a report, the only way to make this more user friendly at the moment is to create hidden fields that are populated with template formulas or try to make the section dynamic and map to L2s.
It would be much more user friendly and make configuration easier if you could just map each applicable cell to a field on the same record level. This would reduce template formulas that have to run…
6 votes -
Advanced Data Table - Total Row Validation on dynamic advanced data table sections
Often times clients want to enforce a minimum or maximum amounts on certain columns such as request amount or match amount on an advanced data table total row. This currently isn't possible without passing the data to a static section. This makes validation tedious and time consuming to configure, but also more complicated for a client to edit and update later.
One should be able to use validation in the amounts in the total row only such as:
-Comparing the amount in one column to a field on the grant or linked cycle
-Comparing the amount in one total column…6 votes
- Don't see your idea?