Settings and activity
14 results found
-
7 votes
Landon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesLandon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesLandon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
-
49 votesLandon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesLandon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Landon Gilmour
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesLandon Gilmour
shared this idea
·
-
22 votesLandon Gilmour
shared this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Landon Gilmour
commented
Yes, this would be really helpful! Although it doesn't come up a lot, we have had situations where a multi-fund voucher has accidentally been processed twice (with a minor difference in the reference number so it wasn't blocked by the system). We then had to create multiple invoices to record the reimbursement and credit the various funds, so a multi-fund invoice would really simplify this scenario. It would also be clearer to the vendor/customer we are invoicing to have a single invoice with the full amount due, rather than explain they need to pay the sum of two or three invoices.
Landon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesLandon Gilmour
shared this idea
·
-
16 votesLandon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
-
157 votesLandon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
-
139 votesLandon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
-
54 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Landon Gilmour
commented
Great idea!
Landon Gilmour
supported this idea
·
A quick update to this idea--I see that the voucher refund has been implemented (thank you!!). In it's current state, this tool only allows for one fund and expense account to be entered. This means that if we are receiving a refund for a multi-fund voucher, or a single-fund voucher involving multiple expense accounts, then we have to create a separate refund for each fund and/or expense account combination. If possible to enhance this tool to allow multi-fund and expense account refunds, that would be amazing. In the meantime the existing tool is a big improvement so thanks again for implementing that :)