Settings and activity
79 results found
-
6 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Dana Fiel
commented
As others have mentioned, the description field should not be mandatory. Many of our donors do not include a grant description when submitting grants through the portal and I anticipate this causing issues/frustration for them.
I do not think updating the grant interface was a necessary change. If anything, it is now more difficult for grant reviewers to verify information because they need to switch between different tabs (request, files, notes, etc.) for backup as opposed to everything being listed on one page.
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
49 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
-
69 votes
Dana Fiel
supported this idea
·
I agree with all of these points. If an auditor were to select a recurring grant that was cancelled/deleted by a fund advisor we would have no backup to give them. This could be a huge issue. The recurring grant history and record should never fully disappear from CSuite.