Skip to content

Settings and activity

10 results found

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Cecile LaBore shared this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Cecile LaBore commented  · 

    Thanks so much for suggesting this, Carolyn- it was just MADDENING to have to wait for all those Pro reports to fully download when I was working through the eligibility checks on >180 applications!

    Cecile LaBore supported this idea  · 
  3. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Cecile LaBore commented  · 

    I've actually been told "the Wiki is out of date on that" when trying to find coding references for workflows, etc. I've also noticed that the search results are not always what I'm looking for.

    Example: if I type in something like "date formulas" looking for a way to calculate the value of an "End Date" field based on an existing Start Date field contents and the contents of a "duration" field of "24 months" search results show me "list view overview", "custom fields general information" and "upgrades by category" before finally offering me "custom field type: special - calculated value".

    Looking at the contents of those pages, "date formula" is most relevant to the fourth offering in the list. However, even there, there's no relevant information on how to do such a date calculation, only how to add a specified number of days to an existing date or find the difference between dates in two existing fields.

    Cecile LaBore supported this idea  · 
  4. 23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Cecile LaBore supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Cecile LaBore shared this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Cecile LaBore shared this idea  · 
  7. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Cecile LaBore commented  · 

    Use case:

    An L1 form field used by 2 programs (ProgA and ProgB) collects data ("Priorities addressed") that is relevant foundation-wide, but in immediate use only for ProgA, so it would be nice to caption the field "Priorities for ProgA" (for ProgA) and "Foundation Priorities" (for ProgB).

    Cecile LaBore supported this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Cecile LaBore supported this idea  · 
  9. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Cecile LaBore commented  · 

    Risk of what?

  10. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Cecile LaBore supported this idea  ·