199 results found
-
Enable a History for the Dynamic Visibility changes
When editing a Dynamic Visibility, there is no history of what changes were made as the system does with most parts of the platform. Some Dyn Visibility trees are long and we do not have any way to see what changes were applied.
1 vote -
Enable a History for the Dynamic Visibility changes
When editing a Dynamic Visibility, there is no history of what changes were made as the system does with most parts of the platform. Some Dyn Visibility trees are long and we do not have any way to see what changes were applied.
1 vote -
Ability to permission the view parent/split screen functionality based on status
Often review forms are configured with a conflict of interest status. In the conflict of interest status, reviewers should be able to see a few fields from the application, but not have access to the full application. Currently the only way to configure this is to disable the reviewer from viewing the parent record and configuring a custom field to be used to view the grant in split screen. It would be nice if instead of having to configure a specific field that the view parent/split screen option could be configured to only be visible in specific statuses as built…
4 votes -
Revamp the Person to Person relationship menu
I have a couple of clients that are using the person to person relationship in SmartSimple. This is an older feature that hasn't gotten a lot of love/updates and it would be nice if we could update the UI to match the UI we have for Associations. Right now the UI is pretty out dated and it feels clunky to navigate.
4 votes -
Batch allocation
It would be useful to have a drag and drop type interface for allocating tasks or people where high volumes are involved. Examples include sharing hundreds to applications between a number of committee meetings or hundreds of review tasks between a number of reviewers
1 voteMonitoring Interest ·
AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
We see the challenge you have highlighted and the opportunity to improve. We suspect a solution would involve revisiting the design/approach to using assignment grid. Let' see the interest to drive future consideration,
-
Add reports to SmartCards
If you have some reports you are using all the time you should be able to star them to your SmartCards.
1 voteMonitoring Interest ·AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
Good suggestion, we have linked this to the report builder workshop sessions occurring over these next few months in order to evaluate the priority against the larger report improvement opportunities.
-
Webinars held at times European users can attend
Can you please hold webinars at a time where European Smartsimple users can attend or hold separate webinars for European users.
The last three webinars: SmartSimple's February 2026 Upgrade Overview, Configuring SMTP OAuth 2.0 for Office 365 and Online Project-Based Test to Production (T2P) have all been held at 02:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) which is 8pm Central European time and 7pm GMT. This excludes European users from participating in these webinars and we miss out on important information. Please consider making a change to these. Thank you.
1 votePlanned ·AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
Great suggestion, for many of the webinars including the product upgrade webinars, we offer multiple times to handle the range of time zones. The main sessions you reference are delivered by Support, they have committed to an earlier time to better accommodate European users.
-
Replacement of Google reCAPTCHA with a more privacy-friendly alternative
At the moment SmartSimple does use Google reCAPTCHA v2 or v3 as a security measure on the system. The use of Google reCAPCTHA however raises privacy issues since Google uses the data (IP adresses, Browser and device, user info, cookies) for own purposes. Google collects more data than is neccessary for the functioning of the reCAPTCHA. The use of Google reCPATCHA v3 raises even more privacy issues since in v3 Google continously analyses online behaviour and users are not aware anymore that their online behaviour is analyzed.
We would like to have a more privacy friendly reCAPTCHA on the system,…
2 votes -
Allow impact maps to run off of grant record owner (Primary Contact)
Currently Impact Maps can only run for organization based grants. Please allow them to run for grants to individuals which would reference the Primary Contact field on a record.
4 votes -
Need to be able to attach an organization to L2 payment records
We need to be able to attach a payee organization on an L2 payment record that can be different from the org listed on the L1. We've had to create a number of inelegant workarounds in the record and in reporting to get payments to work for our business processes. If it worked like the standard organization field on the L1, that would be the functionality we need.
4 votes -
Enable deletion of non-relevant categories in the system
Currently, some categories (e.g., "Sub-Organisations") appear in the left-hand side menu even when they are not used. For instance, when adding organisations, the "Sub-Organisations" category is not relevant, yet it cannot be removed. The system should allow administrators to hide or delete categories that are not applicable to improve usability and reduce menu clutter.
4 votes -
Branding Customization
Change colours on reporting charts. More flexibility to include branding colours and logos. Possibility to upload images/logos in Smartfolders to add own icons.
4 votes -
Expanding Auto Archive Settings
It would be helpful for the Auto Archive feature to be configured per status that triggers it, so that there is more granular control over how records get archived.
For example, despite multiple statuses being able to trigger the archival process, if they must be unarchived, they all get the same status.
Additionally, it would be helpful to also be able to define when the auto archival process happens. For example, perhaps after a day, week, or month. Being able to define that per status add more flexibility.
2 votes -
Expand popup for annotation replies
The annotation reply is quite small if you had a multi paragraph write-up that needs to be edited/annotated.
We would greatly value for an ability to expand annotation reply size (field value specifically). Yes, you can change the field length from bottom right corner, but that's quite restrictive for a multi paragraph reply
1 vote -
Link Payments and Reports to support automation
We'd like to link Payments and Reports in a meaningful way to support automated Payment Status updates. We currently have a 'soft link' configured so that you can see required Reports and their approval status on a Payment record. But staff must manually update the Payment status once all associated Reports are in an Approved Status.
1 vote -
Re-use previous notification
Add the possibility to re-activate a previous notification. Currently we set up a notification for a period of time and once this period is over the notification becomes archived and non-editable. It would be great if we could re-use a previously made notification by simply re-activating it and setting up a new period of time of its visibility.
1 voteMonitoring Interest ·AdminJohn Fulton
(Director of Product Management, SmartSimple, Foundant Technologies)
responded
Good suggestion, we will consider a 'copy' option to support this use case
-
Data Retention Policy Updates
We need the ability to upload new files after previous files have been removed through the data retention policy. To support this, it may be necessary to introduce an additional retention option—for example, an option that removes the file/data but unlocks the field for new uploads, as opposed to the current setting that simply removes the file/data.
A typical use case is annual reporting, where applicants are required to submit fresh documentation each year in the same report. In these scenarios, the field must be cleared according to retention rules, but still remain open for new uploads moving forward.
2 votes -
"Lookup - Organization and People" fields updated via workflow task
It would be helpful if "Lookup - Organization and People" field type could be updated via workflow task. Currently, If you try to add this field in an "Update custom field value task" you get a message "Not Records Found".
In a process where an organization is moved to a specific status and some fields are updated via workflow, it would be nice to also be able to update the "Lookup - Organization and People" ones.
2 votes -
Display all fields on Charts
Display all data fields on Chart key. Right now, the Chart only displays 8 fields and you need to scroll to see additional fields. When you download the chart, only some of the fields are displayed.
1 vote -
Promotion Rollback for Project-Based T2P Tool
Introduce a rollback feature in the new project-based T2P tool to allow reverting configuration changes promoted to test or production environments.
Use Case:
After promoting changes to a test environment, testing revealed issues, and a decision was made to not proceed with those configuration changes. In this case, the rollback feature would allow reverting specific changes within the current environment to its prior state. Similarly, if changes have been promoted to production and need to be temporarily undone, the rollback function would enable this.Implementation:
On the Import tab of the T2P tool, capture the pre-change state before applying any…6 votes
- Don't see your idea?