814 results found
-
Evaluator Reassignments
It is great to have the new simplified way to unassign evaluators from opportunities. However, it would be nice to also have the option to reassign evaluator roles on the same screen. Currently, if I unassign evaluator X from five of the evaluations they have been assigned, but want to maintain the ten they have completed, I have to make sure to write down which evaluations were cancelled so that I can pull them up and reassign them to another evaluator. It would be much easier to enter evaluator X's evaluation assignments, click the ones that need to be 'unassigned'…
2 votes -
Report-able comments
It would be great to be able to run reports on comments!
2 votes -
Reportable Admin-only data on organizational summary
I'd like to be able to add "admin only" visibility fields to the organizational summary, in such a way that they can be reported on. This would be helpful as a way to code organizations and their work as e.g. "healthcare" or "legal support" without having to add that to every single application.
2 votes -
Editing/Deleting a Comment
Currently, the ability for a user with a Grant Manager role to edit or delete a comment added to an organization or a request is tied to the Manage Requests permission (allowing them to approve, deny, close, and abandon a request).
I'd like to suggest that Grant Managers be able to edit and delete their own comments regardless of their ability to approve, deny, close, or abandon a request.1 vote -
Follow Up Forms in Org History
Add an option for Follow Up forms to be shared to all users within an organization.
For new users, even if the system is set to share all organizational history, follow up forms are not shared unless manually added using the collaborate feature. With the high turnover in nonprofits, for multi-year grants, reports may be filled out by a different staff member on each report & need to see what was previously submitted on follow up forms/reports, not just the application. With over 100+ grantees, this can become a huge time burden to manually add new staff to each past…2 votes -
Evaluators Can See Pinned Comments?
It came to our attention in the middle of a committee meeting that a pinned comment was viewable to all evaluators. We've been using this feature to flag orgs for a variety of reasons and this information shouldn't be shared with evaluators. It would be great if there was an option to toggle on/off which users can see these.
1 vote -
Anonymous Review Features
We would like the ability to choose which Contact Fields are visible to the evaluator, with an option to show a Unique Applicant ID (that is not the current system generated one). Having all fields [HIDDEN] and not providing a way to identify each application eliminates the reviewers ability to determine which applications they want to recommend to move forward in the process, as our Foundation does not abide by highest score practices.
We have to implement anonymous review practices based on applicant/evaluator conflict of interest (i.e. Foundation Staff Reviewing applications from Foundation Staff). In order to ensure this is…
7 votes -
third party back to draft (reopen) / UI/UX for Save/Submit
During this UA cycle I have had an inordinate number of third party requests accidentally click Submit instead of Save, and then not be able to edit their request, they email me, they have to send me what they want to put in the form, and then I add it for them.
It would be great if we could address this in two ways: 1) allow administrators to "revert back to draft" or reopen the third party submissions. They would still need to communicate with me, but it would save their time of opening the request, copying/pasting questions to rewrite…
1 vote -
Improve student applicant experience in SLM
The idea is that 3rd party recommenders should only be invited one-time to recommend eligible students.
With the roll out of the new student dashboard in SLM, ineligible students are seeing "Action Needed" on their dashboards if they have outstanding recommendations.
The problem is twofold 1) Ineligible students believe they qualify or have action items 2) recommenders are wasting their time
Right now, the system either seeks recommendation for ineligible students (if 3rd party questions are built into the UA) OR requires eligible students to seek multiple recommendations from the same people for each eligible scholarship (if 3rd party questions…
11 votes -
Real-Time Score Summation on Evaluation Forms
The Problem: Currently, evaluators can only see the total percentage on their dashboard after submission. While filling out a form, they have no way to see the cumulative raw score unless they calculate it manually. This adds unnecessary cognitive load and leads to "scoring blind," where evaluators aren't sure if their individual marks align with the final grade they intended to give.
The Solution: Add a "Total Score Counter" at the bottom of evaluation forms (or as a sticky header/footer). This counter should update in real-time as the evaluator selects scores for individual questions.
Key Benefits:
Accuracy: Evaluators can immediately…
1 vote -
admin attach additional documents to slm request
I would like to propose adding functionality to the SLM Admin role to allow admins to attach documents to SLM opportunity requests that are not part of the application itself. For example, sometimes we receive letters of recommendation for students which have already been submitted by another recommender, or I have to compile some details about the student/situation that are pertinent to my reviewers' understanding of the application. It would be great to be able to hit an "attach a document" button within the Document Viewer to add an additional upload on that particular student's opportunity.
1 vote -
Automated Scoring
We receive approximately 600 applicants through our universal application each cycle. It would be great if certain components of the application could be automatically scored such as GPA or SAI from FAFSA.
Automating these purely objective metrics would significantly reduce the time burden on reviewers and administrators. Most important to me is minimizing the need for follow-up corrections due to scoring inconsistencies.
2 votes -
sanela.radoievici@greatermelbournefoundation.org.au
Completing a CSuite sync from Live to Sandbox breaks the integration with GLM sandbox. It would be extremely beneficial to have this integration re-establish automatically where there is a connection in live.
This avoids having to contact support each time a sync has been completed from CSuite Live to CSuite Sandbox.
2 votes -
Reporting on Pinned Comments
I know it is not currently possible to report on pinned comments, but if there is an opportunity to add that feature in the future it would greatly be appreciated. One of the main ways we used pinned comments is to make notes about previous grantees who have not submitted long, overdue reports or had another important interaction that it is helpful for all administrators to know.
It would be helpful to run a report on all the pinned comments so that we can know if we receive a future LOI, I can quickly review a report of all pinned…
2 votes -
smurillo@cffoxvalley.org
Remove archived admin fee IDs from the available option in settings. When making edits to the admin fee field in the profile settings the archived admin fees still appear which causes confusion in selecting the active admin fees. Our current work around is to change the admin fee name to include zzz or 'DO NOT USE.' I wish the system would look at the active list and connect only those IDs to the available list. Thanks!
1 vote -
Admin-Triggered Third-Party Reminder Emails Within an Application
Would it be possible to add a feature that allows administrators to trigger a third-party reminder email or access point from within a students application?
We’ve found that third-party users (recommenders, principals, etc.) are struggling to locate their original request email. An admin-triggered reminder option within the application would allow administrators to quickly resend the request and help ensure third-party users can complete their requested information more easily.
1 vote -
jmize@durrfoundation.com
Please add the ability to export the history of grants made on the Requests Page to an Excel sheet. Currently, you cannot copy nor export, so I end up retyping the history for my board which is tedious and allows for errors in the data.
1 vote -
Thank-You Email to Evaluators
I would love to have a way to trigger a thank-you email to evaluators who have finished submitting their evaluations.
2 votes -
nmitchell@cfbroward.org
GLM - In the Eligibility Center it would be nice to have search options of First Name, Last Name, Eligibility Form, as well as Organization Name, to be able to see any submissions by anyone in the organization, (within a selected time frame).
2 votes -
Journal Entries
Eliminate separate journal entries from being produced when there are multiple funds attached to a single journal entry. The creation of multiple journal entries makes it more difficult to review.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?