Skip to content

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

904 results found

  1. Allow for the use of Customized Fields in search criteria for organizations and users, not all current fields are useful. An example of this is TAX ID - This is not a useful search field

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. We need a progress report, accessible from the Dashboard, that shows the progress of each evaluator by # of evaluations and what status they are in: No login, Pending, Draft, Complete. A quick color coded bar: White, Red, Orange, Green would be all that's needed and make it easy to identify who needs to complete evaluations as deadlines draw near. This could also be accomplished by buckets of status, with evaluator names located within each bucket OR a Percentage Complete after each Evaluator name. And of the above three would help in identifying evaluators that need a nudge.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. I am having a very hard time working through the system and gathering email addresses to communicate. Since the new display was updated now your email addresses don’t show fully in the dashboard. In the past I was about to highlight and copy the email address, but now if they are too long, which most are, I cannot. This is a recommendation to display the email addresses where you can see the entire thing:

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. I know others have asked for this, I think it would be really helpful for any foundation or funder that has multiple processes per year. Right now, our program officers are seeing an increasingly longer list of randomly-ordered processes to choose from when they're filtering. Our Archived list count is currently 38, and we've only been using GLM since 2024! Even just defaulting to an alphabetic order, as opposed to "the order in which processes are created" or whatever it is currently, would be helpful.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  UI/UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add the ability to set a Default Subject Line for Grant Letter Emails in Grants Content.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Simple, or maybe not so simple, request to add “donation advisor” as a receipt merge field option.

    For us this would allow build out of conditional formatting related to acknowledgement of Donor Advised Gifts. See original support email below for reasoning and/or more details.

    I was hoping you could help us finalize a new template we are developing for our “simple acknowledgement” receipt. This is the version we use when we want to provide a record of the gift but intentionally do not include tax language.

    The issue we are running into is that I have not been able to…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Merge Docs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Currently "Internal Description" in a marketing campaign pulls existing data from the internal description on the Fund that is connected to the campaign. It would be helpful if "Internal Description" was its own field connected to the campaign itself and could be used in reports. This would enable another source of data for campaigns. Or it would be helpful to be able to have a custom field for campaigns.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. I would love to be able to include Soft Credit information on Donation Reports.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. A Link Preview Card is that clickable photo that appears when you share a link on social media.

    For SLM / GLM / Giving Portal, these cards don't have any pictures when you share their urls, which makes them look sketchy / broken.

    I would like to be able to add metatags to the <head> of the HTML of our SLM/GLM/Giving Portal so that a nice picture shows up when we share links to these things.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Custom Data  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. It seems every part of foundant requires a different login. I had to create one for the idea lab. This is very confusing and sometimes my password storage confuses them. Please simplify!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. I would appreciate the option to leave the chat queue. I may have to run to a meeting, or have answered my own question. I would rather not waste other clients time in the queue.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. I would appreciate the option to allow evaluators to turn off the side-by-side view. I have an evaluator with limited vision and the side-by-side makes it hard for him to view the applications and forms. I provided a workaround showing him how to download and open a pdf of the application, but this doesnt resize the evaluation form.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Suggestion: Award Detail or Award Summary when hovering over the Ribbon on the summary page for users.

    Can you create key words showing the link when hovering over the ribbon? Our users have not been able to locate their grant award easily.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. We're getting an increasing number of applicants submitting their attachments in Apple file formats (primarily Numbers and Pages) and currently have to either download, convert and reupload them as compatible files or have applicants send in new documents via email in order to make the attachments viewable in GLM for our review team. Is there way to get the document viewer to work with Apple formats?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Please consider for the new request summary update to allow custom questions to be added to the contact info box, and for the ability to share questions from registration forms to other forms.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. On the applicant dashboard, the status next to the scholarship requests should include 'assigned' or 'completed' for follow-ups. Currently, it shows assigned for the follow- ups but unless the applicant goes one step further and actually opens the application, they can't quickly tell if they have something due or if it has been completed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Statuses  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Allowing branching questions within a follow up form will improve the grantee experience by only answering the most relevant questions based on the responses.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Follow Ups  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. We had several fake applications submitted in our last grant process. Mostly we suspect real people using AI to help them build "believable" documentation for the evidence request, such as fake Schedule F or P&L statements as well as fake vendor receipts for reimbursable activities. We'd love to have some sort of detection tool for spotting those as we had several red flags across the fake apps that were shared. See attachment for details.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Form Building  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. SLM: Please add a random number generator for Applicant ID to make the applications truly double-blind.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. For our use with scholarships and our budgets it would be helpful to allow the user within foundant to designate the years we are calculating the three-year average. For example, our scholarship budget is due in the fall of one academic year, and it's created before the end of the FY. Therefore, we need to be able to calculate the average of the three years prior. So, for example, to calculate the FY26 Spending it was calculated off the EOFY 2025, 2024 and 2023. We need it to be calculated off of EOFY 2024, 2023, 2022. The ability to change…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 45 46
  • Don't see your idea?