Skip to content

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

394 results found

  1. When exporting data from a process, the date an application, LOI, etc was submitted is not included...though the date it was created is. I think the more relevant information is when an application was submitted.

    I recognize that date submitted is available via the dashboard; however, it adds several steps of trying to harmonize the dashboard copy paste to the data exported from GLM to achieve the same result. I might add that the dashboard date does not include the actual time an application was submitted...useful for those who have 5 pm cut offs for grant applciations and want to…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  2. I would like it if we could up the character limit on our application page. I do not know if this is a reoccuring problem for everyone, but i know our organization has a hard time including all our information, with html included, within the 1000 character limit.

    Idea posted February 21, 2012 by Kyle Castronova, OMeGA

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. My initial question to Support: "One of our processes closed last night at midnight. A number of applicants successfully submitted their applications before the deadline, but their dashboard page says the submitted date was today, which, technically means they submitted late, and which caused me to receive a number of panicky emails. Can this be fixed?"

    The response I got: "The date on the applicant dashboard currently uses GMT. There is no way for us to change this but switching to Central has been suggested to our developers. You can also post the idea to the Idea lab to see…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Implemented  ·  3 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
  4. Hello:

    The "red X" that is showing up in the file upload section is causing much confusion among our applicants. They think this means that the file has not been uploaded, or there is an error. I understand that it is to delete the uploaded file. Perhaps a different icon could be used? Or a Delete icon? We are now receiving the attachments via fax, email etc as so many applicants are stating they cannot upload documents...when in fact they have been uploaded.

    Thanks!

    Emily Bronson

    Program Coordinator

    Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Implemented  ·  3 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
  5. The application page for our users has been a source of confusion even among, presumably, sophisticated users who are neuroscientists. In particular, the question we get is, "Where do I click to apply?" (We add a number of links to our process description which, admittedly, does not help.)

    Currently, there is great (now even greater) flexibility in how the process descriptions are formatted. However, there is no similar love for the process title. It would be nice to make the process title – ultimately, the link to the actual process application page – to stand out by being in bold…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Implemented  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →
  6. It would be helpful to be able to preview a process' report fields without going into a form and attaching the process.

    Maybe where we have "Save Process", "Cancel" and "Copy Process" we could have "Preview Report Fields". Then when a person clicks on "Preview Report Fields" we would be shown the same thing we would see if we attached it to the process' application.

    I don't know if this is possible. It was just a thought.

    Angie

    posted July 22, 2013 by Angie Boecker, Central Minnesota Arts Board

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Implemented  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →
  7. It would be helpful to add one more field as an option for reports and that is sort name. I use organization name, but those agencies with a The in front of their name throw off my alphabetical list every time! And I too think it would be helpful to have an uncheck all box in table layout.

    Thanks.

    Laura

    posted March 12, 2013 by Laura Duty, Carl B. & Florence E. King Foundation

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Implemented  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →
  8. In addition to the "Not Included," "Included," "Required," and "Internal" states, add a "Locked" state to report fields. This would allow them to appear on the selected forms but not be editable. For any content to show in these fields they would have to be included on a previous form in an editable state, and then that information would be used as a reference on future forms with the locked state. For example, I have a "Grant Conditions" field in the "Included" state on an approval form, and want it shown in the "Locked" state on a follow-up form, so…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  9. Our board finds that when completing Evaluations, the organizations who are unlucky enough to have names starting with the later letters of the alphabet get less reviewing attention (because you need to scroll down to see them on the screen). If there was a way to adjust the sorting and display of organizations during the evaluation process, it might help level the playing field among applicants being reviewed.

    Sorting by date the application was submitted, geographic area or program area would all be helpful, in addition to alphabetical. I'm picturing a drop down box where the Evaluator could select how…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  UI/UX  ·  Admin →
  10. When I added our new CEO as an administrator to our site, he was automatically added to all email notifications that go to administrators. With the 5.0 release, it requires a lot of work to go into each folllow up form and each step of each process to remove him from the notifications. It would be great if there were either a way at the start to indicate whether you want a new administrator to be added to all or none of the notifications (and then they can be added specifically where applicable) or a way to see which notifications…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
  11. We used to be able to approve a grant and then assign a follow up form from the same page. Now, I approve each individual grant, but then have to pull up the "project page" to add a follow up. There are a lot of added mouse clicks that don't make sense. If I'm going to add a follow up form, I'm going to do it when I approve the grant. To streamline the workflow, it would be much more convenient to accomplish this all on the same page.

    0 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Implemented  ·  4 comments  ·  Admin →
  12. It would be great if we could see the Payment Tracking page by Process.

    Idea posted May 20, 2011 by Mary Nicosia, GMA Foundations

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  13. Is there a reason why the street address is not on the Beta reports? If
    I want to use it for mail merge I would need a street address – can that
    be added please?

    Idea posted February 27, 2012 by Carol Barrett, C. Louis Meyer Family Foundation

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  14. Whether searching under Organizations or Users, there's no message that comes up letting you know that nothing was found with the keywords you used.

    Idea posted June 28, 2011 by Mary Nicosia, GMA Foundations

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  15. I love the ability to enter in decision comments, but if we don't finalize the decision (approve/decline) of an LOI or App., GLM doesn't save those comments. It would be valuable to me if comments could be saved in interim, because certain LOIs/Apps require further discussion with other Board members. Right now I resort to printing out the LOI/App and keeping written notes to bring to a meeting.

    Idea posted July 3, 2012 by Meredith Huffman

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
  16. I know this has come up before, but I wonder if there's been any progress on making the grant status not immediately available to applicants.

    Recently, I updated grant decisions for one of our clients and within an hour or so an applicant had emailed the program officer to ask if the new "Final Report Due" status meant there had been news. The applicant hadn't even been checking on that particular application, but had logged in to apply to another of our clients and, reaching the Status page, noticed the change.

    Had we been able to keep the status under…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
  17. Hi - I don't know if others agree, but, one I deactivate a User, it would be great if the system would bring me back to the organization page. Once I've deactivated a User, there's no real need for me to be on their page anymore, but I have to click View Organization to get back out. It's just one more click, but I've been doing a lot of cleanup since the merge option went live, so it's quite a few clicks.

    Thanks,

    Mary

    posted May 8, 2013 by Mary Nicosia, GMA Foundations

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Implemented  ·  2 comments  ·  UI/UX  ·  Admin →
  18. Please add Business Titles to Reports Beta. All other contact/address info is available. Proper business letters include titles.

    Titles are available in Data Export. Only problem is, as of today, Data Export is broken. Doesn't export the correct info for Organization contacts.

    Idea posted November 8, 2012 by James Maguire, Merck Family Fund

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  19. After approving a grant you may want to make a payment and record the payment amount, check number and date of the payment. This is currently doable in the Payment Tracking area but it's been requested we come up with an easier work flow in addition to Payment Tracking.

    One Idea: When you click on a requests Project Name you are taken to the page with all the request's information. At the bottom of that page is the Payment Information. In this section we add a button that says "Make a Payment" and that directs you to the page where…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  20. We use Evaluation 2 as our board evalaution. Our board would like to be able to identify on their dashboard which applications they have read but not yet voted on. Is it possible to add another symbol such as a yellow dot - and a question on their evaluation form to put the application in this status? Thanks.

    Idea posted August 31, 2012 by Jane Somers, The Hamilton Family Foundation

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Implemented  ·  2 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?