Settings and activity
118 results found
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteVonda Carr
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
76 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
Yes! Or a way to auto assign an internal reviewer to the follow up report. It is time consuming to go into each submitted report, find out what staff member reviewed the application, and assign them the follow up to review.
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
163 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
Not sure if I am in the correct space for this comment. I would like one person at an organization to be "administrator" for that organization. Large organizations keep making multiple logins and the executive director or finance person have no idea what is going on. If they could see all applications being submitted like administrators do, it would be very helpful. School districts are the worst. Teachers go rogue. I have a school district with 58 active emails and the business office has no idea.
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
144 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
To add to the customize status idea, it would be great to have stages in the status option. Our applications go through multiple layers of review (staff, committee, board, notification, etc.) and to be able to say which stage the application is in would be stress reducing for applicants. Even more so for applicants that have multiple application in multiple processes.
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
A status of "withdrawn" would be helpful. I have wanted this status before but now, as a result of COVID-19, it would be even more helpful. Several applicants submitted applications that were on track to be approved but they withdrew them because the program could not move forward. Denied seems harsh and in ten years you will have to go in and read the comments to find out it was actually denied but withdrawn.
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
I am coming back to this thread to see if it has gained any momentum. The spring grant round was very interesting. Two applicants were technically denied because they could not be funded through the process where they applied. However, they will still be receiving funding. Denied is still freaking them out. The third applicant withdrew their application because they realized they are not in a place to apply. Denied is freaking them out because we said they could apply next year. Also new staff members do not always drill down past seeing denied and assume it cannot be funded "Withdrawn" would ease the anxiety on both sides.
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
I am checking to see if there is any progress on this idea. We would like to track our grantee site visits in GLM instead of another document. But when they cannot be exported, we have to go organization by organization to read the information. To have it on each application would be amazing also. It would be easier to track a specific project over multiple years.
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
53 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
47 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
I love this idea! We are not using the budget table at this time because we have large agencies that would need so many lines that it would be overwhelming for most applicants.