Settings and activity
109 results found
-
140 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment 
Vonda Carr
commented
A status of "withdrawn" would be helpful. I have wanted this status before but now, as a result of COVID-19, it would be even more helpful. Several applicants submitted applications that were on track to be approved but they withdrew them because the program could not move forward. Denied seems harsh and in ten years you will have to go in and read the comments to find out it was actually denied but withdrawn.
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
I am coming back to this thread to see if it has gained any momentum. The spring grant round was very interesting. Two applicants were technically denied because they could not be funded through the process where they applied. However, they will still be receiving funding. Denied is still freaking them out. The third applicant withdrew their application because they realized they are not in a place to apply. Denied is freaking them out because we said they could apply next year. Also new staff members do not always drill down past seeing denied and assume it cannot be funded "Withdrawn" would ease the anxiety on both sides.
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
I am checking to see if there is any progress on this idea. We would like to track our grantee site visits in GLM instead of another document. But when they cannot be exported, we have to go organization by organization to read the information. To have it on each application would be amazing also. It would be easier to track a specific project over multiple years.
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
77 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
104 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
I am back to comment on this idea again because I am merging documents for a board meeting. I have to use the old process of dumping into Excel, merging documents, and reformatting because I cannot use Eval 1 or Eval 2 fields.
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
This is exactly the idea I came here to post!
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
78 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesVonda Carr
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesVonda Carr
shared this idea
·
-
54 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
Since I am doing this yet again for an agency, I wanted to see if there is any traction for this request.
An error occurred while saving the comment Vonda Carr
commented
I would love to see this implemented. Our agencies typically have multiple open grants. If a staff person changes, it is very time consuming to reassign grants and/or follow ups one by one.
Vonda Carr
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
-
84 votesVonda Carr
supported this idea
·
To add to the customize status idea, it would be great to have stages in the status option. Our applications go through multiple layers of review (staff, committee, board, notification, etc.) and to be able to say which stage the application is in would be stress reducing for applicants. Even more so for applicants that have multiple application in multiple processes.