Skip to content

Settings and activity

44 results found

  1. 68 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  2. 102 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrea Clements commented  · 

    Currently, there are two tabs in the Fund Advisor portion of the portal that seem redundant - Grants and Grant Requests. In the old portal, those two had separate functions. "Grants" listed all grant history, etc. and "Grant Requests" allowed those who had permission to request a grant. In the new portal, the two tabs seem redundant due to the new Create Grant Request button that shows on every tab. The only portion I can see on the Grant Requests tab that is unique is grant requests that need approval. Could all grant information be moved to the Grants Tab and the Grant Requests permission be connected only to the "Create Grant Request" button? When Grant Requests permission is "Yes" then the Create Grant Request button shows. All other pertinent grant information is listed under the "Grants" tab.

  3. 27 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  5. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  6. 59 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  7. 82 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrea Clements commented  · 

    This is the closest suggestion in Idea Lab I could find for what I'd like to suggest. It would be great to be able to copy questions from different processes without having to use the time consuming BOAT method to match the code in the back for reporting. For instance, we have changed the way we'd like to collect demographic data within our grant application/final report. Our processes are already created and I need to add those questions to each process, and want the questions to be easily reportable without manually adding each question because they aren't linked in the background. Right now, my only option is to use the BOAT method. If I could build the demographic questions in one application, then copy and paste them to all other applications while keeping the background code, that would be ideal.

    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  8. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  9. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  10. 46 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  11. 76 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  12. 46 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  13. 81 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  14. 59 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  15. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  16. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements shared this idea  · 
  17. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrea Clements commented  · 

    We would also appreciate this. We have over 200 evaluators that evaluate scholarships within our UA/Stand Alone processes. We do not require evaluators to evaluate every student, only their top 10 so it is very difficult to know when our evaluators are finished with a specific process within the UA.

    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  18. 226 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  19. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Proposed Idea  ·  Holly Spitz responded

    Moving this idea back to Proposed.  This request is to create a recurring donation from the back end of CSuite and have ACH be a payment option (Currently it is only Stripe).

    Andrea Clements supported this idea  · 
  20. 89 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrea Clements commented  · 

    We would also use this functionality. We have around 200 applicants per year and would use text messages to remind of their application being in draft status, remind to fill out their follow up form (scholarship acceptance form), etc. We would easily use over 1,000 text messages per scholarship season.

    Andrea Clements supported this idea  ·