Settings and activity
102 results found
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Dana Jeffery supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
-
9 votes
-
9 votes
-
6 votes
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Yes! I believe I also posted about this. With Multi-Year funding, it seems like there are broader audiences for reviewing Follow-Ups these days. I have to copy the Follow Up over to an internal process to capture the information for reviewers...it is not my favorite part of the workday.
-
9 votes
-
32 votes
-
3 votes
-
8 votes
-
12 votes
-
6 votes
-
5 votes
-
4 votes
-
6 votes
-
26 votes
-
12 votes
Hi Everyone!
Thank you for the initial feedback.
With our August Monthly Release, we just made this viewable in your live environment. Based on your sandbox feedbac,k we have made a couple of updates:
-Sort order of cards: primary contact in top right and then alpha A-Z, comments, and documents showing newest to oldest left to right.
-Table vs Card view on contacts, documents, and comments, you can change the view to either card or table view.
Foundation Status:
There is a full charity check to view all information. We are continuing to update this view and will highlight the organization more prominently in the coming releases.
An error occurred while saving the comment Like others have mentioned, the Organization Description is not that obvious, just a little menu item at the top. I would prefer to just have a box that shows the description (we use and update this for various reports so we want to see this section - even if it is an expanding section). It seems we have to update it from editing the Organization and looking for the tiny three dot at the top right of Update Organization page...that is obscure!
Also, we want to see the Organization Change Log! More obviously, since it's also buried in the Update Organization page three dot menu. That is not efficient (in my mind). Strangely enough, a lot of changes happen within our organizations and we like to see the "who touched this last" for such changes. Would love to see this more obviously in a one click option.
Thanks! -
54 votes
-
7 votes
-
20 votes
I never thought of having this feature embedded in the system, but this would be a game changer!
We are going to be adding language to our forms that indicate that we understand the use of AI is helpful, but that we do not accept applications that are entirely completed by AI. We have been swamped this year with AI generated applications and have been using ZeroGPT and Copyleaks to test when we suspect the application is using AI. It adds another element to our reviews, but helps us understand how something that doesn't qualify appears to fall within our guidelines.
As a national funder with an open competitive process, we don't have time for the spammy AI requests we are getting. Anything like this could really help us!