33 results found
-
Hide (redact) personal info from reviewers.
We would really like to have the option to hide some of the personal information of the SLM applicants for reviewers. (addr, phone, email).
Be able to still show name, but not personal contact info.23 votes -
Move Requests With Follow-Ups to Different Organization
This functionality was previously available before the update to allow multiple organizations for one user account. This is useful when we have national organizations which apply on behalf of smaller local organizations - oftentimes they will complete the grant agreements and other initial follow-ups, and then the local organization would take over managing reporting for the rest of the lifecycle of the grant award. This is also applicable to fiscal sponsors that manage multiple awards for various organizations, and it makes it easier for us to break them out by each program when pulling reports as needed.
1 voteThis was also discussed in idea lab webinar April 2024.
What checks would be need in place to make sure the user assigned the follow up is also in the organization?
Are there concerns around changing the Organization of an awarded Grant?
Any additional workflows are helpful.
-
UA- Assign evaluations for a reviewer across different processes
UA- Assign evaluations for a reviewer across different processes. We have randomized reviews for our UA applicants (usually 500 applicants) and 70+ reviewers. It is so time consuming to assign each evaluator to their 20 applicants (which can be 200+ unique processes for each evaluator).
This is similar to another idea, but I want to make sure it inlcdes UA too.
3 votes -
Opportunity Name Merge on Shared Supplemental Questions
It would be nice to have a 'merge template' concept included in the supplemental questions so that applicants see "[Scholarship Opportunity Name] Supplemental Questions" when they are working on each opportunity. This will help them remember which set of supplemental questions they are completing when they may have multiple opportunities still open.
1 vote -
Award Details Grant Total Line
Add a Grant Total Line on Award Details Tab so that we don't have to go back to the Application or Follow-ups to figure out how much we have given and still owe.
3 votes -
access code
Add the ability to add an access code to a universal application
1 vote -
Ability to Copy Universe in SLM
We would like to have the feature of copying Universes so we don't have to go back to Sandbox, edit, and then port over to the main site. We made many changes in the live site hoping we could copy for next year, and realized that functionality doesn't exist.
18 votes -
SLM Committees
When you click Search committees it would be nice if the list of committees was alphabetized by name.
8 votes -
Application Start date in application drafts bucket
Often times we extend the application for only specific students (however, this can range from 50 ot more or less students). I do not know the names of the students since the school cannot divulge that information. I was hoping to look at the start date of their drafted application in order to identify the students I am extending the opportunity for based on the donors request. A start date in the drafted applications would be very helpful for this purpose.
3 votes -
Ability to mark Ineligible Universe Requests in Eligibility Center as "reviewed/resolved."
The Ineligible Universe Request tab is helpful, but it would be improved if there could be a way to mark each one as reviewed/resolved. I periodically check this tab, but am having difficulty tracking which ones are new and yet to be reviewed.
4 votes -
Print Universal Application questions by opportunities
It would be helpful to be able to print just the questions associated with one opportunity in the Universal Application. Currently you can preview, but when you print the questions list it prints the entire UA. Donors like to be able to see their application, and aren't interested in and get confused by seeing more than what they need.
7 votes -
Applicant Copy Functionality for UA
It would be great if students could use the applicant copy functionality from processes to the UA and vise versa. We have both stand alone processes and a universal application (different timelines). We have approx.. 250 students who apply to both. It would be great if they could import answers from one to the other.
6 votes -
Mark Applicant Opportunities by Question Group SLM
Right now, when you create a new question in the universal application, you have go to each question and change what opportunities this question applies to. This can be very time consuming as there are over 45 opportunities linked to the universal application. It would make sense to be able to mark the applicant opportunities by question group as the default then if you need to make individual changes to some question, it would be much less time consuming. I set up my question groups to directly correlate with the the applicant eligibility and selection criteria for each scholarship.
For…
8 votes
- Don't see your idea?