Skip to content

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

9 results found

  1. evaluator dashboard filter

    I would love an easy way for evaluators to differentiate or even hide their evaluation 1 or evaluation 2 responses. I have a board committee that does an initial review (evaluation 1) before sending recommendations to the full board for review (evaluation 2). The committee members struggle to keep track of what they've done when they're working on the evaluation 2 round. It would be great if they could click a button to filter out the eval 1 responses! (giving them the ability is important because that group refers back to their original responses.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Allow iPhone photos (.heic photos) to be viewable in Document Viewer

    If an applicant uploads an iPhone photo (.heic photo) then you will not be able to view it within the system. You will need to download it to your computer first. Would like to be able to view .heic photos within the system.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Table-Style Question: Formatted for Reviewers/Evaluators

    It would be really beneficial for reviewers to be able to see all information that applicants enter/type in the table cells when using the side-by-side evaluation display. Currently, the number of characters that display per row is very limited.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Adding evaluators regardless of role

    Currently, once evaluations have begun, if an evaluator does not hold the role that has been assigned for the evaluation (e.g. administrator instead of board member), we cannot add that evaluator unless we add give them that additional role. Is there a reason that the role of the evaluator must be specified at the time the process is configured and that it cannot be changed once evaluations have begun? It would be nice to be able to add evaluators for an application or LOI on the fly from a list of all GLM users within our foundation, instead of being…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Allow Evaluators to Batch Download Apps

    I love that admins can now batch download apps but it would be super helpful if evaluators could as well rather than relying on admins to create evaluator packets. I have 25 or more reviewers each reviewing different sets of applications. I don't want to have to make 25 different packets (right now, I just instruct them on how to download apps but it would be great if I could say if you want to download them all, just...)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Board Member Access to Follow Up Reports

    The process to access Follow Up reports for our board members is certainly cumbersome, and discourages board members from using the online data (read this as I have to produce paper copies of each follow-up). A folder on their Dashboard would be helpful; and at a minimum, it would be useful to have a "Return to Follow Ups Submitted" option, so that they don't have to go all the way back to Requests and Decisions to pull up each report.

    45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  22 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Allow for weighting of different evaluation questions

    At this point, we are having to use an external, web-based tool called Jotform to do our quantitative evaluation of proposals because of that programs ability to weight different criteria more heavily than others. This is creating a good amount of double work as we then need to move scores and program officer summary content from Jotform back into Foundant to maintain historical memory. We'd love to see the day when we can shed Jotform altogether. Any chances of that?

    22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Application Evaluation Bucket on Dashboard

    I would be helpful to see "Complete" Status on the Application Evaluation dashboard. How does an Administrator know that an evaluator has completed their review except to have to click in the Application Evaluation "Assigned" - which defeats the purpose of a dashboard? Thank you

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. In-line evaluation!

    I would really love to see a more efficient way to do in-line evaluation - such that the reviewer can read the entire application (including uploaded documents) and score at the same time. There is currently a way to insert "shared questions" into the evaluation form... but it is incomplete and does not include uploaded documents. Pretty please??? Thank you!!

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base