Settings and activity
39 results found
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Zoe Parham commented
I'll add to this sentiment that a feature to randomize reviewers would be one of the biggest updates for increased efficiency.
-
5 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
20 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
32 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
59 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
23 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
83 votes
Thank you for the idea.
Would you hope this is implemented across all processes?
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
38 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
62 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Zoe Parham supported this idea ·
Our ideal scenario is to take 60 applications (for the same opportunity) with 9 reviewers, and randomly assign each of them 20 applications.
Sorting alphabetically leads to the issue of the same 3 folks reviewing the same 20 applications, when another set of 3 folks may review more harshly...
Opportunity based assignment isn't an option for us in this scenario.
Alphabetical assignment wouldn't solve this specific issue.