Settings and activity
36 results found
-
37 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Zoe Parham
commented
I'll add to this sentiment that a feature to randomize reviewers would be one of the biggest updates for increased efficiency.
-
5 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
Thank you for the idea.
Would you hope this is implemented across all processes?
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Zoe Parham
supported this idea
·
Our ideal scenario is to take 60 applications (for the same opportunity) with 9 reviewers, and randomly assign each of them 20 applications.
Sorting alphabetically leads to the issue of the same 3 folks reviewing the same 20 applications, when another set of 3 folks may review more harshly...
Opportunity based assignment isn't an option for us in this scenario.
Alphabetical assignment wouldn't solve this specific issue.