997 results found
-
rearrange forms in Process Manger
It would be wonderful if we could rearrange the forms in Process Manager to have them alphabetical or whatever arrangement makes most sense for each user
6 votesConfirming you are referencing the general forms tab with in the page.
Please not that can be sorted by the column header, today.
-
Adding organization name in Follow Ups
Our grant agreements in Follow Ups in Foundant GLM. We are looking to add the system Organization Name field in the follow up form. Since the available options on Follow Up forms don't allow me to pull system field info, I've had to ask for applicants to type "Organization Name" info on all applications just so that I can share this on the Follow Up (Grant Agreement). It would be easier if I could pull directly from the Org Info page on the follow up.
1 vote -
copy request
Could we make the "This request was created as a copy by..." message more prominent? It would help if it jumped out at us so that we can do the required cleanup after a request has been copied.
2 votesCan you please share the message you are referring to.
Also, it would be helpful to understand the clean up need because that might give us the idea for other opportunities to make the tool easier to use.
-the foundant team
-
Automatic emails to evaluators
When evaluators are assigned applications as a batch action, it would be really helpful if an automatic email could go out to each evaluator letting them know they have been assigned applications for a particular process (one email per process, not per application). Currently, the only way evaluators can receive an automatic email is if each application is assigned one by one. That's time-consuming for the person assigning the evaluators, and that would generate a lot of individual emails to each evaluator. Having automatic emails go out to evaluators after batch assignments are made would eliminate the current two-step process…
5 votes -
Evaluator 1 & 2 Required Question Flag
I would like to see Evaluator 1 & 2 forms have a hard stop if someone does not answer the required questions in their form. The same type of message applicants receive when they miss a question.
Currently, they can save the form and do not receive a warning they have missed any questions. Staff must check each evaluation to see if someone does not answer a question(s), call/email the evaluator, get them to log back into the system, complete the question(s), and we have to rerun our reports. It is very time consuming. Evaluators get cranky when they get…
1 vote -
Reviewer assignments -suggestion for reviewers to access app's at later date
It would be great to be able to assign reviewers to applications on X date, but for the reviewers to not be able to access the applications until a later date and time that could be set in Foundant.
1 vote -
Batch Assign Applications to Evaluators by Applicant Name Automatically
We have about 60 scholarships, 200 applicants (1,100 applications), and 32 reviewers every year. When I assign applications for review, I want every student to be assigned to 2 reviewers. And I want all reviewers to have roughly the same number of applicants/students (not applications since we use Universal App). So I sort the applications by applicant name, and then manually click all applications for students x, y, z, and then batch assign to 2 reviewers. I have to repeat this process for all 1,100 applications in the system. I would love for there to be an automated way to…
5 votes -
copy previous answers
We are currently use processes for each scholarship we hold at our Foundation. We have a scholarship advisory committee for each scholarship. We have some people who serve on multiple scholarship committees, so they do end up evaluating the same applicant for multiple scholarships. We are recommending that evaluators have the ability to copy previous scores/comments from one evaluation to another for the same applicant. For example, if they are evaluating on their GPA and academic performance, that won't change from application to application. They are requesting to copy the scores and comments as a previous answer to another evaluation…
3 votes -
SLM Comment button position
Perhaps we leave an inordinate amount of comments (?) but it is driving me crazy that I have to scroll all the way to the bottom to hit the Add Comment button. Can that show up at the top instead.
Thank you for all your attention.1 vote -
Internal follow-ups viewable by applicant?
In line with Trust-Based Philanthropy, more and more foundations are completing verbal reporting with grantees, where the foundation staff completes the written follow-up form based on a conversation with a grantee. We have been doing this as an internal follow-up form, but would like the option for the grantee to view what we've typed into the form and confirm that it is accurate and complete before submitting the report and marking it as complete. Other than downloading each follow-up form packet as a PDF and emailing it to them for their manual feedback, is there a way to either:
1.…10 votes -
Batch Deny to Move to Denial Draft
It would be a huge timesaver if there were an option for Batch Denied applications to be move to Denial Draft.
If you have a lot of applications, it takes a a very long time to do this one application at a time.
3 votes -
revert status
I'd like to request more control over the "Revert Status" function in SLM. Batch revert capability would be wonderful, and also the ability to choose from any stage in the cycle to revert to rather than having to revert one step at a time (i.e. from denied to denial draft, then from denial draft to complete).
3 votes -
Evaluator view grid
I heard from an Evaluator who was frustrated with the view of a grid/table on his evaluator view. As he was working in the side-by-side (evaluator/application) view, he coudln't see any of the content of the (in this case) Student Activities grid. There was content in boxes that he wanted to see but the dropdown carrot took up most of the space and he couldn't read the student replies.
Getting rid of the carrots would probably help but just in general, some way to better view the contents of a grid format answer would be wonderful.
Also - this same…3 votesWe plan to do research on reviewer needs in Q2/Q3 of 2024 we will follow up on this idea lab item with specific question, or to step up discovery conversations.
-sammie
-
Allow Custom Registration Fields for Custom Columns
If custom fields are created on the registration form for organizations OR applicants, currently those fields are not available to be added in Custom Columns. It would be really helpful to have this functionality for visibility when coding payments, classifying applicants, and for eligibility.
12 votes -
Integrate bill pay to payment tracking
We would love to be able to integrate our bill pay system with GLM so it will automatically update who we have paid after a check run.
5 votes -
Streamlining Third Party Question Groups
Asking an applicant to compose an email to their anonymous third party is an extra step that overcomplicates things. The applicant has to deal with opening up an email interface, copy-pasting a pre-written message, etc. And for what? It's redundant to send the third party an email explaining that they'll be getting another email.
It should work like references on a resume. Provide us with the third party's email address, and we'll contact them ourselves. Simple as.
8 votes -
Change font color for SLM
Once the student hits submit on the UA, is there a way to change the font color of those opportunities that have additional information pending. Currently everything is black or blue, would like to change the "EDIT APPLICATION" to RED to catch the students eye.
7 votes -
Changing American spelling for Australian clients for Organization and Recognized
Changing American spelling for Australian clients for Organization and Recognized. (S instead of Z) Currently this is on the payment page for a donation but I am sure there are other spellings throughout the platform and GLM. For our Australian clients/donors it looks like we have spelt it wrong.
2 votes -
Evaluator score columns needed
We need side-by-side columns for our evaluators so that they can see how their individual application score compares to the group of evaluators' average score. Only the person in the admin role can see the average group score. And, if the admin is also an evaluator, things get messy quickly in a meeting. An admin/evaluator can never see both their individual score column and the average score column without flipping between roles. Having the ability to see individual scores and average scores on ONE PAGE in side-by-side columns will greatly help with our evaluation meetings and enable us to make…
9 votes -
Opportunities within a UA process updated after evaluation concluded
Can the number of students that are eligible for our active opportunities within a UA process, be updated once the first evaluation is determined? We had 223 students eligible for one of our opportunities, but then once they were evaluated they were no longer eligible, but that number in opportunities did not change.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?