Skip to content

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

1109 results found

  1. We have had several requests from teachers asking if they can view their students applications before they are submitted. We would like to be able to provide this access without providing access to too many other functions. If evaluators were able to get applications assigned to them while they are in draft, I think this would give the teachers the ability they want and still restrict access to the current evaluator permission.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. It would be great if it is was possible to customize the text in a task notification to include the details of the tasks rather than having to click on the link to see which task it refers to!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. It would be helpful to have the option to set up automatic emails to selected administrators when an evaluation form is completed, or better yet when all evaluators have completed their required questions. I know most evaluations happen on set cycles and deadlines, but we have some that are considered on a rolling basis, so it would cut out some room for error/delay if we could receive a nudge when our evaluators are finished.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  2 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. I run a report called "Pipeline" that shows all applications in process (draft, submitted, evaluation assigned, etc). The report includes the submission history showing when the request is initially submitted, however, there is no way to capture in the report when the actual application was first started. To get that date I have to go into each application and click on the request history tab and then manually add that date into my report.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. On the Key Interactions page (GLM), Organization Name appears only when the Source Type is "Organization." For interactions with Source Type "Request" or "User," the Organization is not displayed. The upshot is that when a note/Interaction is tied to a Request, we must try to determine the Organization based on the Project Title, which is very challenging.

    Please consider offering some way to display Organization Name with a "Request" or "User" Source Type.

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  CRM  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. It would be nice to be able to batch add/remove collaborator. We have an organization that we work with that submits over a dozen grants a year to us. When they have a staffing change, it is cumbersome for them to add the new team member to all those grants. We often end up doing it for them and would like to be able to do it in batch.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Batch  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Batch Reassign applicant - I would like to be able to select multiple applications and reassign them. We have a user that has over a dozen applications and another employee is taking over for that user. It is tedious to go into each application and reassign each one.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Batch  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. I use the nonprofit descriptions in the nonprofit dashboard in the grant packets I pull for our Board members. I find that after many years, org descriptions need to be updated but nonprofits cannot do that themselves... they have to rely on me to do this. It would be super helpful if I could ask the nonprofits to take that step themselves.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Many times, a question will take up less than 10% of the width of the form. I would like to see a column functionality added to reduce the vertical length of the application.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Form Building  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Why in the world has the Candid Charity Check been moved from the tab section above the Application to the left side of the Agency's profile? This is utterly inconvenient.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reviewing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. This new update has been throwing me off.

    Previously, when I went to Email History, the Sent section showed the organization name the email was sent to. Since the update, it only shows the recipient's name instead of the organization.

    My job consists of checking which organizations have opened emails, so seeing only the recipient's name isn't very helpful. Unless someone has memorized over 100 staff members and knows which organization each person belongs to which is nearly impossible, especially with frequent staff changes it's difficult to quickly identify the organization.

    Is there a way to change this back, or…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. The idea is to allow follow up forms to be saved as landscape or portrait.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Follow Ups  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. "If your Organization information does not appear correct, please contact [org name]. Thank you."

    I've had most all of my testers tell me that the tiny text on the top of a new application needs to include an email address or phone number when referring to changing an org name for the contact. (Email preferred.)

    I am requesting that this text be customizable by client either by Foundant Staff (like the user registration form) or by client. I'm open to a couple different options, but this text isn't helpful as is.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Dear Foundant Development Team,

    I am writing to request an enhancement to the follow-up functionality in Foundant that we believe would better support both grantmakers and grantees.

    Our organization intentionally uses soft deadlines for grantee follow-ups because we recognize that our nonprofit partners are focused on meaningful work in the community, and we do not want to create unnecessary pressure through rigid reporting requirements. The soft deadline reflects our philosophy of being flexible and supportive while still gathering important information about project progress and community impact.

    However, we have encountered an unintended consequence of this functionality. Because the follow-ups are…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Follow Ups  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. I've been asking about Foundant having overall CRM capabilities and was under the impression that that functionality was in the pipeline. I appreciate the new features, but so far, we still do not have the ability to track and report on interactions with individuals who are not applicants. I realize I can add any contacts to the system, but if they aren't an applicant, there is no way to report on those entries. I asked about categorizing individuals, for example, political, religious, medical, law enforcement, etc., and I was told a category field could be created, but that there is…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Ability for Foundant to block an organization or user that is not welcome to apply for a process.
    This would be a permanent block that would prevent bots or fake organizations applying to a process. Lately, I've experienced an influx of "Testing Testing" organization applying to a process. I deactivate the user and archive the organization and it reappears in a process the next day.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. The new system search results are a helpful view but have lost the functionality to open organization or user pages in new tab by using a right click. The only options available now are to copy or export the table. This functionality also is lost when previewing an organization merge, making it impossible to compare details beyond the date created without having to completely start over. Please bring back the option to open links in a new tab when viewing results in a table.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  UI/UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. While the email template does (for example) 06/22/2026, it would be nice to have the ability to format it such as June 22, 2026.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  1 comment  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Problem: Applicants and grantees don't realize that clicking the organization name on their dashboard opens the agency overview page. Because this navigation is hidden, they are missing out on critical information and documents.

    Recommendation: Make the organization name look like a clickable link, or add a distinct button/label (e.g., "View Agency Overview") to make this page easily discoverable.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. MCP connector for Community Suite and GLM so that users can connect via AI tools like Claude or Codex.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 55 56
  • Don't see your idea?