Skip to content

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

1053 results found

  1. Can we default reports to export without formatting? The grey seems unnecessary. It would also be great if emails through the system weren't grey either. Thanks!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. I'd like to be able to pull a report based on the time and date when an evaluator submitted an evaluation form. That data exists - it can be found under a request's submission history - but I want to be able to know when the evaluator submitted the form, not when it was marked as complete.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Suggestion: Having a preexisting field(s) that allows the user to filter active from archived organization in reports without the need for filtering out specific organizations using the "organization name" field.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. It would be helpful for me if the system could assign a control number as applications are submitted. Often I use the reports for blind reviews and while I can hide the applicant information it would be best to have a reference number or control number to use instead of identifying the application by title as that is often a cumbersome way to identify/cross reference an entry.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. It would be really helpful to have a timestamp added to the 'Initial Submit Date' custom column, so we can see the submission time. We have just closed a grant round, and had an application sneak through after the deadline, but unless we go into the submission log for each individual application we have no way of identifying which one it is!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. the most recent upgrade got rid of the key icon in the upper right hand corner of a user's profile and i liked to propose it (or something similar) be added back. It was extremely helpful to have a visual indicator on the main screen of the user profile of if the user had system access or not. A color-coded indicator (green for access, red for no access) would be an improvement on the previous dark grey/light grey key icon.

    The icon wouldn't need to be functional (like it used to be) now that the toggle for turning access on/off…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  UI/UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. It would be great if an eligibility quiz could be used to filter applicants for specific grant opportunities. So, depending on how they answer the questions in the quiz, it would then show different application opportunities. For example, if the applicant belongs to a small organization that is not scalable and has a limited budget, then after completing the quiz, an application specifically designed for this type of organization would be available to them.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. To determine grantee payout, total the sum of several expense fields and multiply that number by the grantee's match percentage.

    Currently, this is all done by hand because Foundant does not have the capability for custom formula fields. It would streamline our processes and eliminate much confusion for both us and our grantees if these calculations were done automatically and in real time.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. To determine grantee payout, total the sum of several expense fields and multiply that number by the grantee's match percentage.

    Currently, this is all done by hand because Foundant does not have the capability for custom formula fields. It would streamline our processes and eliminate much confusion for both us and our grantees if these calculations were done automatically and in real time.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Hey there! Regarding Summary section under any Profile, ex: Profile -> Donor -> Summary -> "Donation Summary (Direct and Advised) (Household and Members)" Section. For some reason, there's no values for the yearly totals for this section, as opposed to the "Donation Summary (Household and Members)" section, which does.

    It's very convenient that the Donation Summary sums up the totals of each year, Fund, and all time giving, but I'd if the Advised AND Direct Summary Table also provided those values, as it can be time consuming calculating those values by hand when we need that information when meeting with…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. When using the LOI process, there are buttons that say "Save LOI" and "LOI Complete." We use the LOI process for other things than just an LOI, including sponsorship requests. It's confusing to have these buttons when the request isn't an LOI. Would be wonderful if we can customize the language in those buttons. If not, changing those buttons to something more generic like "Save Request" and "Request Complete" would help them be relevant to most scenarios.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. When using the LOI process, there are buttons that say "Save LOI" and "LOI Complete." We use the LOI process for other things than just an LOI, including sponsorship requests. It's confusing to have these buttons when the request isn't an LOI. Would be wonderful if we can customize the language in those buttons. If not, changing those buttons to something more generic like "Save Request" and "Request Complete" would help them be relevant to most scenarios.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Please restore the site settings allowing admins to designate specific org page fields that can be updated by applicants. I recognize that not every client wants this, but as a trust-based org, we'd like to give our grantee partners the autonomy to update their address on their own rather than having to reach out to us. (And if you all don't recall how this used to work, please reach out to me for more details.)

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Currently we can't edit the SSO enforcement message, but it would be helpful to be able to include the correct url that should be used by internal employees to access our company portal.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. As part of our October Monthly Release, we introduced a User Setting that allows you to preview the updated User Summary layout in your Sandbox environment.

    This redesigned view consolidates key user details into a streamlined format to improve efficiency and usability.

    We’d love your input!

    Please use this thread to share any feedback, suggestions, or questions about the new layout:

    Is the information easy to find?
    Are there any workflows that feel smoother or harder?
    Anything missing or unexpected?

    Your feedback is instrumental as we refine this experience ahead of full release.

    Thank you for helping us improve!
    –…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Feedback Needed  ·  1 comment  ·  UI/UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    1. Please create a workflow that allows receipts to be marked at sent automatically when entering donations manually.
    2. Please also automatically post all tax receipts to the donor portal when they are sent.
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Add a save button to the top of the profile types list (and other areas where the potential for a long list exists, such as the Philanthropic Interest Type) instead of only at the bottom. In our case, we have a long list of profile types, so scrolling all the way to the bottom of the page each time to click save can be cumbersome.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Select User Window
    It would be helpful to have the User Name link directly to their user accounts in the Select User Window to make deactivating or changing account roles quick and easy.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Having the ability to track in-kind donations i.e. non-monetary but like marketing support or gift cards or gift bags with a value

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Currently, when processing grants as a batch from spendable in CSuite, alerts that would trigger when a grant is processed individually do not populate when those grants are processed as a batch.

    Having a screen that pops up prior to creating grants from spendable as a batch listing all of the fund or other alerts that would come up individually all in one place for that batch would make the alert functionality integrate with batch functionality properly, ensuring those alerts are not missed due to which processing option a user chooses to use.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  Batch  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?