928 results found
-
Applicant Filter
From the SLM Dashboard we have the ability to Filter by Processes. In the same way it would be great to be able to Filter by Applicant.
We do not use universal application so this filter would allow us to group, screen and use Batch options based on an applicant name.
2 votesWe recently introduced Filters to the workload grids. Through these filters, you can narrow down the list by applicant name. Reach out to support@foundant.com to learn more, and please let us know if this helps you manage your workflows.
-
SLM UA - Share Evaluations
The share evaluation function, with anonymity option, needs to be added to each UA opportunity as it exists in non-UA processes.
2 votes -
copy request
Could we make the "This request was created as a copy by..." message more prominent? It would help if it jumped out at us so that we can do the required cleanup after a request has been copied.
2 votesCan you please share the message you are referring to.
Also, it would be helpful to understand the clean up need because that might give us the idea for other opportunities to make the tool easier to use.
-the foundant team
-
Shared Documents in GLM by Process
I'm reposting this since it was first submitted a few years ago and it is still an issue for us. It would be very beneficial to allow Shared Documents to be uploaded per Process. Currently if you upload shared documents, all board members in other processes can also see anything that is uploaded. We are unable to use this for our committees for this reason and I have to e-mail the documents versus the board members being able to review them in Foundant.
2 votes -
copy without uploads
It would be helpful if there were an option to copy applications without uploads. Often we only want the basic info and not the uploads, especially in a process with branching logic that only requires the uploads based on the answers. It's a problem to change or delete the prior uploads: first you have to answer the branching question with the value that shows them, take action, then change the answer back to the current value.
2 votes -
Additional Evaluations
We have several stages of evaluation; the two evaluations are not sufficient for us to be able to understand and assess applications effectively. It would be helpful if we could add additional evaluations, as needed, by process.
2 votes -
Batch Deny to Move to Denial Draft
It would be a huge timesaver if there were an option for Batch Denied applications to be move to Denial Draft.
If you have a lot of applications, it takes a a very long time to do this one application at a time.
2 votes -
pdf with no comments
We use the Administrator Comments feature to provide draft review feedback to our applicants. Many applicants use the comments, then want us to remove them so that they can create a clean PDF of their completed application. We don't want to delete our comments as that is part of the grant process record, but we also don't want reviewers to be able to see the comments. Right now, our only option is to make all the comments not visible to applicants, proxy as the applicant, download the PDF, then make all the comments visible to the applicant again. This is…
2 votes -
Suppressing Applicant Name / Project Field in Evaluation
We have 20+ scholarships that want applicant names suppressed from applications in the evaluation process. We have always had the student fill out the "Project Name" field with their name. This year, we had everything setup to suppress applicant details from the evaluators, but did not realize that the "Project Name" cannot be suppressed. We had to manually go in and change every student's name to a code in the Project Name field.
Short of instructing students in the future to not use their name as the project name field, is there any chance the Project Name field could also…
2 votes -
Changing American spelling for Australian clients for Organization and Recognized
Changing American spelling for Australian clients for Organization and Recognized. (S instead of Z) Currently this is on the payment page for a donation but I am sure there are other spellings throughout the platform and GLM. For our Australian clients/donors it looks like we have spelt it wrong.
2 votes -
SLM UA Color
We have three SLM UA's that students can apply to and as it currently appears on a student's dashboard, all UA's are in the color blue. Is there a way that each UA has their own color. This will help with an inclusivity for color blindness.
2 votes -
Move the Copy Request option of Select Initial Status to the top of the list of Process selections
Back in the day, when you could Copy Request, we could just copy into Draft and still be able to submit as an Applicant without too much stress. At least, that is how I remember the system working. Especially working with Internal Processes. We may have even had a Submit button at the bottom. I don't recall exactly, but now, it's a bit more work.
Now, I have to be sure to scroll to the bottom of my long list of processes to be able to find the Select Initial Status options and be sure to select the Submitted option-particularly…
2 votes -
Third Evaluation Option
It would be helpful to have more than 2 evaluation options for Universal Applications. Scholarship Opportunities vary vastly in what is important. Being able to have the Internal Evaluation and a choice of either the complex or simple evaluation form for the 2nd choice would be most helpful!
2 votes -
Organization Viewable by Applicant - Primary Contact
Add an option to the 'Organization Viewable by Applicant' site setting in GLM to be able to set the visibility to users marked as the primary contact. It'd give us an option that is more restrictive that the 'all' option but more automated than the 'user-by-user' option.
2 votes -
Evaluation Assigned - Initial Submit date
Allow Initial Submit Date on Evaluation Assigned page to be the date that organization submitted their LOI or Application so evaluators can see at a glance when LOI's or Applications were submitted.
2 votes -
SLM: customize Evaluator dashboard view by Process
We have a scholarship with a 2-step evaluation process. It would be great if we could customize the dashboard view of Evaluators to show not just the score, but Evaluator responses to one of the custom questions. Our committee is sophisticated enough that they are comfortable changing the sort order on the available columns, and adding an additional column to show an additional assessment question would provide them with more flexibility.
2 votes -
Collaborator feature for Grant Managers
Allow the collaborator feature for grant manager profiles so grant managers can add collaborators to a grantee's profile.
2 votes -
Batch add multiple Processes when assigning new Evaluators.
Batch add multiple Processes when assigning new Evaluators.
We've just discovered when trying to add in a new evaluator to our scholarship process, we have to add in every single scholarship opportunity separately as an individual process instead of being able to select "all", which, is what we need to do.
So our "Universe" of applications breaks down into "Processes" which are our individual scholarships and because we look at everything from the individual Student (and not the opportunities), we need to be able to batch multiple processes all at the same time.
The way things are currently set up,…
2 votes -
SLM Committee Overhaul
We would like to see an overhaul of the SLM Committee features. It would be great if we could see the email address associated with the committee members within each committee, drill into each user directly, and have some type of drill in from the Universe or vice versa.
2 votes -
It would be helpful if the evaluation scores for each section could be added to give a total score for an applicant.
We have ten questions that get scored 1-5 that make a final score for each applicant. It would be helpful if those scores could be added automatically.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?