935 results found
-
Customize Batch Evaluator Packets
Would there be a way to customize what is shown on an evaluator packet? We typically allow board members to view a folder of evaluator packets, but they get long and we want to make it easier for board members to quickly digest a grant. Is there a way to either customize what we include in the packets or easily batch download the executive summaries for all of our grants in a given cycle?
2 votes -
drop downs for personal information
Would it be possible to add a drop down for students wheen filling out personal information. ie Mr., Ms. and that when a student types street or St. it would auto change to Street? this would save us so much time in making corrections.
4 votes -
On the Universal Application, a description of each opportunity is provided to the students on the Applicant Opportunities tab. It would be
On the Universal Application, a description of each opportunity is provided to the students on the Applicant Opportunities tab. It would be very helpful if these descriptions could be a merge field in email templates.
2 votes -
Admin ability to move a request from draft to submitted - move button to top
Please move the button up to the top. I have multiple processes so when I copy to a new one, the button to mark draft or submitted is often off the page and out of view so I miss it. Then I copy again and have 3 applications in the system and have to delete two of them while making sure I am deleting the correct ones. This is a simple fix.
3 votes -
Ability to group in new giving hub
The new giving hub does not permit grouping of funds. This is something useful that we will be losing. In addition, there be ability to default to "show additional funds" format. In addition, this "additional funds" is not sorted by priority, but only alphabetically.
2 votes -
Application Form Sections
Change the default for the settings to be CLOSED not open when an applicant first opens the form.
2 votes -
Allow automatic email notifying Administrator of evaluation submission
Our site visit report is currently on the Eval 2 tab. It would be helpful to receive a notification when the site visit report is completed.
8 votes -
downloadable copy of grants catalog
I would like an option to download a version of the online grants catalog. It could be as simple as a list of the non-profits featured or be more detailed and include the brief request, organization name and website. This would help us mail versions of the catalog to donors who prefer paper over digital and allow our Development team to have a paper document to show when meeting with prospective donors.
2 votes -
archive merge templates
It would be a nice option to have the ability to archive merge templates in the system like the emails.
17 votes -
Add a progress bar to applications
Can you please add a progress bar so the applicant can see how much they have to do to submit the application?
2 votes -
Automatic Email for Account Holders when Portal opens
Send an automatic email to people who have opened accounts when the scholarship application portal opens (as well as an automatic email when there is only 1 week left).
1 vote -
Report Complete Automation
It would be helpful for our grantees to receive a message when a previous report was accepted (completed on our end) so they can move onto the next report that’s due. The only notification they receive is if the reports are sent back as incomplete.
3 votes -
Email notification to multiple applicants
I had a partner organization reach out to ask if it was possible for their organization to receive email notification to multiple people from the system. From the sounds of it, in the GLM only the applicant of the request (or assignee of follow-ups) can receive the automatic emails generated from the system.
If it would be possible to have an option to select multiple recipients for an email to be sent from the system that would be great!
9 votes -
Add functionality in tables to clone columns
Just as we can clone rows in tables, I think it would be even more impactful to clone columns. As one use case, we have a table question in a follow-up form that asks for several different outputs (each row being a different output) for each month in a quarter, with each column being a different month. This would have been way easier to build out with a Clone Column feature.
1 vote -
Text Ranking with Score
We would love the ability to display ranking options in text to our evaluators, such as
Extremely Clear
Very Clear
Somewhat Clear
Not So Clear
Not at All ClearBUT - We'd like to store them as numeric data so that
Extremely Clear =5
Very Clear =4
Somewhat Clear =3
Not So Clear =2
Not at All Clear =1To be clear, we don't want to show the numeric to the evaluator, just the text.
Currently, we use a complicated formula to calculate the data.7 votes -
Adding shared questions to installment forms to improve information in payment tracking table
The standard columns for the tables are not optimal for our program, so we've assigned project numbers to each funded application. I would like to be able to see this number in the payment tracking table, but can't add it to the installment form as a shared question. Woiuld this be valuable to others?
I would also like to be able to delete some of the standard columns--project titles take up a lot of space and are not that useful!
5 votes -
Option to Disable Question List Button for Branching Processes
We use branching questions in our grant application that are set to internal so we can branch an applicant to the application we want them to complete and not have multiple processes in our site. I just realized that when an applicant clicks on the "Question List" button in their site, this shows them ALL of the questions in our application, regardless of how the application should be branched. The fact that applicants can see the entire question list for an application seems to negate the purpose of branching. This is very confusing for applicants because they do not know…
4 votesHello,
You are correct in that all branch groups are displayed in the question list; we follow this as best practice for projects like project streamlining so that applicants don't become surprised by the amount of time the application will take them. We also encourage as a best practice that you add instructions to the branch groups for that visibility and communication explain when they will see that group.
However, Internal Questions should not be displayed to applicants. Please report this to our support team so that we can review it.
- The Foudnant Team
-
Assign Primary Contact as Default "Applicant" for Grants Synced from CSuite to GLM
There are some grants that we process in CSuite and then sync over the GLM. The intention is that we can use email templates for batch notifications in GLM to send to the organizations. We also assign follow-up forms for these grants.
However, the emails and follow-ups aren't working. It seems to be because the Applicant is listed as "Unassigned". All of the organizations for these grants already have GLM accounts, so I would love to see the Primary Contact be the default "Applicant", which would enable us to perform these functions in batch. Any way to improve this integration…
1 vote -
SLM: Ability to turn off opportunities on student dashboard/conf. page.
We would like the option for students to not see the opportunities they qualify for when they submit their application. We do not understand the purpose or why this is necessary. It tends to cause more questions and confusion. This is misleading for students if they qualify for a lot of opportunities, but don't receive a scholarship or only get one.
We do not want these to show up on the applicant dashboard as well as the confirmation page.
We would appreciate the option to have this feature turned on or off, even for opportunities that have Supplemental Questions.
1 vote -
Batch unapprove grants from Csuite
There is a weird process you need to do to prevent GLM grants from being processed before a grant agreement has been received...you have to toggle the GLM approval button on then off so the system recognizes the imported Csuite grant. This is annoying and inefficient. There is a batch approve option, why not just add the batch unapprove option?
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?