999 results found
-
We would like the capabilities to delete organizations and users so we can clean up our GLM database.
We currently have an organization that we cannot delete due to a charity check that was conducted. Although this organization has no requests or contacts associated with it, the charity check issue prevents us from removing it. We also would like to have the ability to delete old users who are not tied to our grant applications, not just make them inactive. We currently do not use a CRM program and have used GLM as our main source for data.
4 votes -
SLM/UA Decision: Waitlist
It would be nice to have a section on the admin dashboard that allows applications to be marked as 'alternates' so they don't have to remain in the 'evaluations closed' section. As the site is now, there is no way to hold an application as an alternate other than leaving it in the evaluations closed status.
1 vote -
Automatic email FROM our evaluators once they have completed an evaluation
We should be able to receive an automatic email from our evaluators once they have completed an evaluation. This would be a time-saving program enhancement for scholarship management.
4 votes -
Spelling/Grammar Check Tool in SLM Scholarship Applications
It would be helpful for SLM to include a spelling/grammar check tool within the scholarship applications for students to use when writing their essays or short answer responses. I know that some internet browsers have a spell check included, but it might be helpful from the student side to have a more comprehensive tool to help with spelling, grammar, etc. as they write their responses.
34 votes -
GLM: Block new application if grant report isn't complete
Block new application from applicant who hasn't completed a grant report on a previous grant award. This would encourage applicants to complete their grant report and provide another level of due diligence built into GLM
87 votesThank you for the idea.
Would you hope this is implemented across all processes?
-
SLM Lite version as an option for GLM
An SLM Lite version available for GLM users that only have a few (2) scholarships. It could possibly be offered as a 2+2 option for advanced licenses.
2 votes -
Third Party Dashboard - Request with Common Opportunities
Looking for a way that when someone goes into their 3rd party dashboard, they can see all the processes/opportunities that are grouped together and will be marked complete when they upload an item. See example of possible format attached.
2 votes -
Organization Summary page
Why not add Amount Requested to the new Organization Summary page along with the the Closed (previous) commitments.
2 votesHi Mark, Thank you for the feedback. The one tricky part about requested amount is that it is a custom field and not a system field in 2026 we may be looking at how we can create more system fields, or creating coding that would help us know what fields are similar across clients to use in scenarios like this.
-The Foundant Team
-
default answers (multiple choice)
It would be awesome to be able to assign a default answer to a multiple-choice question (radio button or checkboxes). maybe a check box in the list for "Make this the default answer", if unchecked, there is no default answer. If checked, that selection is the default.
This would be helpful when we have an internal question that is required, but will not need to be answered unless a change is needed. For example, "Does the board require an amendment to consider this grant for approval? Y/N." The grant manager doesn't need to answer this question until after the board…
1 vote -
Let Grantees Submit SOME Follow Ups Out of Order
I understand that there is a feature that allows follow ups to be submitted either sequentially or in any order. This is helpful if you want all follow ups to follow the same rules. However, we need most of our follow ups to be submitted sequentially, and then just a couple of them to be able to be submitted at any time.
We have deadlines for each of our follow ups, but applicants are welcome to submit certain follow ups with a later deadline (i.e. match documentation) before the others (a final grant report, for example, which we do 3…
5 votes -
applied button
The "applied (with check mark)" is confusing our grantees. Grantees can make multiple applications to the same process. They have no idea that "Applied" means they have the correct application submitted. Can you change "Applied" to "Apply". The following page warns them of duplicates anyway. Why confuse things.
3 votes -
Internal follow-up assignment visibility
Submitted on behalf of a client:
I would like the existence of internal follow ups to be visible on the applicant's dashboard. Even if they can't see the information in the internal follow up, the lack of visibility/availability for the client interferes with sequential follow up assignment. Internal/applicant visibility should be a separate issue from interna/applicant assignment.
It would be good if an applicant could see that there is an internal follow up assigned associated with their request. This visibility could be controlled via a setting toggle.
1 vote -
Organize the follow ups
Please provide a way to remove completed electronic signature agreements and completed interim reports from the "follow ups complete" list without having to close the grant. either separate tabs for each or a way to remove them altogether.
1 vote -
Evaluator experience
When using the text box option for answers requiring no more than 250 characters, the text is cut off when evaluators use side-by-side functionality. The workaround is for the evaluator to drag the dotted line dividing the sections to the left, but that is cumbersome and time-consuming. It would be nice to have these short responses automatically wrap when displaying during side-by-side evaluations like the questions that use 'text area' for more than 250 character responses.
1 vote -
Allow "Other: _____" Text option at the end of Checkbox questions
Every other form builder application allows you to add an "Other: _____" text box at the end of Checkbox questions. It's a simple way to catch exceptions that you're not thinking of.
50 votes -
new user summary
The Request section of the SLM new user summary is difficult to navigate. When multiple scholarships are listed, it would be helpful if awarded scholarships appeared at the top.
2 votes -
Integrated Custom Fields in Universe Forms
We would like the ability to add integrated custom fields from CSuite into Universe Forms.
We capture data such as DOB on our application and would like that to integrate to a students CSUITE profile, instead of having to run a bulk update.
6 votes -
webpage for current SmartSimple system status
Create a web location for your SmartSimple customers to visit that displays the current system/network status.
For clarity, when the entire SmartSimple PROD or Back-Up shared system is down for all users, let us be able to check a page to confirm it is a 'you-issue' and not an 'us-issue' to avoid reaching out to support or submitting a ticket unnecessarily.
1 vote -
Proccess Title In Search Bar
First off, I love the search bar!!! Through I was wondering if the development team add the process name/grant cycle (even if it's abbreviated). We fund programs with the same name, at the same time and or historically so when I search for a program name, it pops up a list of the programs but I cannot tell which grant cycle the program is from. We have two grant funds and sometimes we have three grant cycles running at the same time due to begin/end cycles.
1 vote -
Issues with 3rd party request changed to "upload myself" option
We have two options for a student to submit a letter of recommendation. They can ask a teacher to do this (via the 3rd party request in the system) or they can elect to upload the letter themselves.
If an applicant starts with the 3rd party request option, but then later changes it to "upload myself" because the original recommender did not follow through, the SLM system still thinks there is a missing 3rd party request.
The student's application stays in the "Action needed" column, even though the letter is uploaded AND it shows as 0/1 in the 3rd Party…
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?