1045 results found
-
ability to delete pledges with pledge adjustments
I would like the ability to delete pledges with pledge adjustments. Thank you
1 vote -
Batch follow ups to Org primary contact
Add functionality to chose who the follow up is assigned to when batching them. Currently, it goes to the applicant account. I’d like it to go to the organization’s primary contact, then they can add contributors. Applicants are often grant writers or development directors with higher rates of turnover than Executive Directors. Some orgs have overdue follow ups simply due to staff turnover.
4 votes -
Group Evaluators
There should be a way to evenly split the applications assigned to evaluators. We receive many grant applications and some reviewers do not have the time to read all applications.
1 vote -
Multiple Automatic Reminders for Follow-Ups
It would be great if GLM could send multiple automatic reminders to grantees about follow-up due dates. We've found it helpful to give grantees a 30-day reminder about a follow-up, but would love it if GLM could send another automatic email a few days before the due date as well to make tracking easier for our grants administrator.
32 votes -
scholarship
When we create a scholarship in CSuite and turn it into a grant the grant description is automatically populated as Fund name :: Student name. We don’t want the student names to be visible in the fundholder portal, which they are if they’re listed in the grant description. Can you create a setting which would only pull in the fund name to the grant description, not the student name?
2 votes -
Evaluator Descriptions
It would be helpful to have the option to move, make bold, or otherwise highlight the Evaluator Descriptions which appear under the scholarship name when an evaluator is reviewing an application in SLM. It is easy to miss the Evaluator Descriptions where they are now and it would help to have them stand out and be more visible/noticeable to evaluators during the review process.
3 votes -
Document Viewer in Documents Tab
I would like to see a document viewer in the documents tab similar to the application feature. Even with descriptive file names, it is time consuming to download each document to review it. We use GLM to store all documents connected to a grant so the number of files can get large.
3 votes -
kbakhshi@fmscleveland.com
Add a Search Bar on request history page, within an organization summary.
It would really help if we could search requests by process in the organization 's grant history. We can alphabetize them today, but using a search would help us.
6 votes -
Merge field for year to use across merge documents like reports for a title
In the list of merge fields have a field for just the year e.g. 2025 so it can be used across all merge reports to put in title e.g. 2025 Board Report
1 vote -
Add Ability to Bulk Delete Email Addresses and Phone #'s from specific profile types.
Add functionality to be able to bulk delete email addresses and/or phone numbers from a specific type of profile. Two options that would help are:
- Add 'type of profile' field to the Download options in Profile Bulk Update
- Add fields 'Email ID' 'Phone ID' in custom report column options.
2 votes -
Table, Labeling Summary Line
A simple 2 column table that ends in a summary row. When building the table, the end summary row on the left hand side can be labeled (e.g. Total Proposed Budget:). But from the Applicants' view, the summary row on the left hand side is blank.
2 votes -
Rank Order Evaluation
We would like the option to Rank Order applications during Evaluation in lieu of giving a percentage score. For example, if there are 30 applications, only 1 application is given #1, one application #2 and so on. This option would be much easier for our Reviewers. In some cases, it is their preferred method of scoring.
I posted this idea 5 years ago and it is still an issue for us.
2 votes -
Red flagging
Red flagging organizations or individuals if they have not completed a follow up report. Saw an idea about stopping an application if the organization has not completed a follow up. This idea would be along the same lines however if would be a more prominent visual alert in foundations work flows
4 votes -
Ability to removed closed bank accounts from Account listing
We would like the ability to remove closed bank accounts from the Reconcile Bank Account module. They just recently made a change to include those and we would like the ability to remove them from that list.
2 votes -
grant catalog
Provide direct access to the grant catalog on the donor portal dashboard without having to first click on grants.
1 vote -
recurring grants
It would be extremely helpful if we could indicate that a grant is an annually recurring opportunity, so that it would automatically be created each year, rather than having to do so manually.
6 votes -
charity check
There is a discrepancy between GLM and CSuite charity checks. When a private foundation applies it 'passes' the charity check unless you think to check in the Publication 78 box. When you run the same org in CSuite, a more obvious charity check message about their private foundation status displays. It would be helpful to have a more clear way of flagging private foundations within GLM before applicants get further in the process.
5 votes -
to include check box questions in the types of questions that can be pulled in as columns from buckets in the dashboard
please include check box questions in the types of questions that can be pulled in as columns from buckets in the dashboard
1 vote -
Deleting Questions
This has happened to me twice now. We should be able to delete questions even though we've answered and deleted the responses. This has messed up my applications.
2 votes -
Auditor Role - Limit Process Access and Add Notification
The auditor role is good for people who need to see and report on a particular grant but they are able to see all the other grant process. It would be great to be able to limit what processes auditors can see. Also, being able to add an auditor to be notified when applications in that process are submitted would be a very handy feature!
1 vote
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Don't see your idea?