951 results found
-
Allow Grant Managers to add/remove users to Multiple Organizations
With the new feature of Adding and Removing Applicants to Multiple Organizations, the grant managers need to be able to have this feature, too!! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
1 vote -
Hide Score Column on the Evaluator Dashboard
We definitely need the ability to add at least three custom columns - 2 is just too few. But while we are limited in the number of columns we can add, it is heartbreaking to have a precious Evaluator column wasted on a system column we don't use. Additionally, because this particular column is there we can't use the Scoring question type, because it will populate this columns with numbers that won't mean anything to our Evaluators and will confuse them. We rank on a 1 through 4 scale with 1 the highest and 4 the lowest - only the…
1 vote -
We are part of a Regional Association of Grant Makers. Most of us use Foundant. one master login would be ideal.
One master login and password for any applicant. We are part of a RAG. Most use Foundant. It would be great if the applicants could log in once to get to all grant makers. One more step to a single application.
1 vote -
Printing application & Returning to saved application
From one of our grantees:
When saving application DRAFTS, it would be easier and save us time if the application returned to the question that we were last writing rather than to a separate page where we then need to return to the top of the application page and find the question where we left off.
Also, if we could print the DRAFT applications directly, rather than downloading a PDF first, that would again be a timesaver.
1 vote -
Allow "Committee Evaluators" to view all applications in a process- not just the ones they are assigned to evaluate
It is impossible for every committee member to evaluate every submitted application, yet all the committee members are making the decisions when it comes time to vote on grant approvals and declinations. Instead of creating and sharing a report with everyone, it would be great it they had access to "view only" or "read only" all the applications that were submitted but not assigned to them to evaluate so that they aren't hearing about an application for the first time at the grants meeting when it's time to make decisions.
1 vote -
operations account aggregator
We would like an account aggregator that feeds directly from our main bank account into our general ledger (or someplace). We have missed transactions (due to human error) and this would prevent us from missing transactions that occur in our checking account.
1 vote -
reneamuellerleile@rosenaufoundation.org
Enable administration of a "blinded" review without having to update Application form multiple times (i.e., visibility of questions for Applicant, visibility for Evaluation 1 blinded review, visibility for Evaluation 2 unblinded). Since there is one Application form ("master") this is very challenging and presents potential for errors.
1 vote -
Set CSuite Service Area and Grant Type in GLM approval form
Our grant approval workflow include setting the value for custom fields in the grant approval form (grant subtype, type of support, etc.). Then the Service Area and Grant Type need to be added after the grant is synced with CSuite. It would be SO helpful to be able to set the CSte Service Area and Grant Type field here as well so that coding does not have to be done in two places. In other words, change from a read-only field in GLM to an editable field like the custom field are.
1 vote -
SLM: Adding Upload Responses to Quick Grid Views
We would like to request that Upload Responses, such as transcripts, be added to the Submitted and Complete bucket Quick Grid Views. Often, we need to pull transcripts or other uploads quickly, and it's difficult to go into each student's application to search, view, and download transcripts. If the uploads appeared in the Quick Grid View, we would be able to view these uploads more efficiently.
1 vote -
Approve all payment installments through UA Related Opportunities tab
It would be more efficient if UA scholarship installments could be approved from the Related Opportunities tab rather than having to click into each opportunity separately and navigate to the award details tab.
1 voteHello,
Thank you for your feedback! I also want to make sure you know you can batch approve installments from the payment tracking page today.
-sammie
-
Custom navigation
I am suggesting that the header area be made editable. It would be worthwhile if we could truly mimic our website header (logo and navigation) so the user thinks they never truly leave our website since there is no option to embed Foundant forms.
1 vote -
"Close Request" button
The "close request" button has caused confusion for our staff. It's being clicked accidentally. As you go through the scholarship workflow, you often click the buttons in the bottom right corner. The Close Request button is located in the bottom right, but is not a button we want clicked. I also think using the word Closed is not the right word to use. Could the button be moved and the name changed to indicate something more drastic? "Close" can sound like you are just finishing this particular step in the process. Thank you!
1 vote -
Submit Button that can be greyed out with "wrong answers" to questions
It would be nice on forms, if the Submit button can be greyed out if a specific answer to a question is selected. Or if we could select rules for the submit button much like branching questions.
1 voteHello Penny,
What sort of rules would like to see related to the submit button?
-
Tracking Conversations and Meetings with Non-Profit Organizations
My manager and I are looking for a way to track our interactions with non-profit organizations within Foundant. We frequently have conversations, tours, and meetings with these organizations and want to keep a comprehensive history for internal tracking purposes within Foundant.
I have been told there is no current feature in Foundant that allows us to input and monitor this information. This could be a very helpful feature for donors and their administrations to track and keep a running record.
1 vote -
Adding organization name in Follow Ups
Our grant agreements in Follow Ups in Foundant GLM. We are looking to add the system Organization Name field in the follow up form. Since the available options on Follow Up forms don't allow me to pull system field info, I've had to ask for applicants to type "Organization Name" info on all applications just so that I can share this on the Follow Up (Grant Agreement). It would be easier if I could pull directly from the Org Info page on the follow up.
1 vote -
Evaluator 1 & 2 Required Question Flag
I would like to see Evaluator 1 & 2 forms have a hard stop if someone does not answer the required questions in their form. The same type of message applicants receive when they miss a question.
Currently, they can save the form and do not receive a warning they have missed any questions. Staff must check each evaluation to see if someone does not answer a question(s), call/email the evaluator, get them to log back into the system, complete the question(s), and we have to rerun our reports. It is very time consuming. Evaluators get cranky when they get…
1 vote -
Reviewer assignments -suggestion for reviewers to access app's at later date
It would be great to be able to assign reviewers to applications on X date, but for the reviewers to not be able to access the applications until a later date and time that could be set in Foundant.
1 vote -
SLM Comment button position
Perhaps we leave an inordinate amount of comments (?) but it is driving me crazy that I have to scroll all the way to the bottom to hit the Add Comment button. Can that show up at the top instead.
Thank you for all your attention.1 vote -
Grant applications searched for by using the "Referred by" field
Issue: Board members want to be able to view and export a grant application list that were referred by them.
Provide ability to search for grant applications with "Referred by" search term with pull-down menu from the "Referred by" field.1 vote -
revert status
I'd like to request more control over the "Revert Status" function in SLM. Batch revert capability would be wonderful, and also the ability to choose from any stage in the cycle to revert to rather than having to revert one step at a time (i.e. from denied to denial draft, then from denial draft to complete).
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?