935 results found
-
Can over character limits be formated to be red?
Ok, we all know red means alert. I have so many applicants who get confused about not being able to submit an LOI, Application, or Follow-up due to being over the character limit. There is no visual cue to direct them. Can that please be changed and save me the time of having to figure out what the problem is, having to increase the character count or explain it one more time?
1 vote -
Tax Receipt For Gift With Multiple Designations
Our grantmaking organization has one large fundraiser each year for 20+ nonprofits. We often have donors who send one check that is distributed across several different nonprofits' funds. When a donor gives one check for one nonprofit, we are able to create a tax receipt using custom fields to share where the gift is routed to. In other words, the tax receipt includes the nonprofit fund, the nonprofit beneficiary, the gift amount, etc.
However, if a check is distributed across multiple nonprofits and funds, this method does not work. We have not found a way to create a tax receipt…
1 vote -
Tax Receipt For Gift With Multiple Designations
Our grantmaking organization has one large fundraiser each year for 20+ nonprofits. We often have donors who send one check that is distributed across several different nonprofits' funds. When a donor gives one check for one nonprofit, we are able to create a tax receipt using custom fields to share where the gift is routed to. In other words, the tax receipt includes the nonprofit fund, the nonprofit beneficiary, the gift amount, etc.
However, if a check is distributed across multiple nonprofits and funds, this method does not work. We have not found a way to create a tax receipt…
1 vote -
Number of Documents for Organization Summary
The number of documents shows up at the request level but not at the organization level. Seeing the number icon on the Documents tab would be helpful because it would indicate that information has been uploaded. I believe the number of comments shows up at the organization level, so would the number of documents be able to be added?
1 vote -
Automatic emails showing the person who completed the follow-up form
It would be helpful when an applicant submits a follow-up form that the automatic email that is sent to the admins has the actual person who submitted the follow-up form. Instead of "A new (blank) has been submitted for (grantee phase)".
3 votes -
Automatic emails showing the person who completed the follow-up form
It would be helpful when an applicant submits a follow-up form that the automatic email that is sent to the admins has the actual person who submitted the follow-up form. Instead of "A new (blank) has been submitted for (grantee phase)".
3 votes -
Manager Evaluations
Currently, once a manager evaluation has been assigned, if the manager reviews it and then realizes it should be reassigned to another manager, if he saves it (even without answering any questions), it locks the evaluation and it cannot be reassigned. This is an issue and has not always been this way. I would like to recommend this be changed so if needing to reassign an evaluation, it can be done without issue by the administrator, even if it has been saved. This has been a very big issue for us during our current grant process and I'd like to…
10 votes -
Universal Application Column Filters
It would be very helpful to add an additional one or two column filters to the process, applicant, project name and eval 1 & 2 headings. I have Graduating High School and Applicant ID currently set. I would like to add Student Status and graduating year so I can see at a glance what I need for the applicant. I have to go into the application to get the info I need which can be time consuming.
2 votes -
Automatic Email to admin for late Follow-up Forms
Admins should have the feature to receive an automatic email when a grantee misses their follow-up deadline. This would help admins with follow-ups assigned at different times to keep track of grantees who don't turn in their reports on time.
9 votes -
side by side text evaluations
The side-by-side view for evaluations does not properly show all of the text for 'text box' type questions. To see the rest of the text a user must manually select the text to make the box scroll - this is nonsensical or select the application button at the top creating a PDF popup.
Please make all the text show so that the evaluators can just have a side by side comparison and not have to open up multiple documents.
3 votes -
conflict of interest notification
I would love an automated email to administrators for GLM/SLM for a conflict of interest question. That way we can see it and assign another evaluator. We shoot for a certain number of reviews of applications and if someone has a conflict of interest we would want to assign a different reviewer for that application.
3 votes -
Payment Graph on Dashboard
On the Dashboard there's the Amount Awarded graph that posts the last 10 years. Our organization would love the Payments graph to show the same (last 10 years vs. last 12 months). Or, we'd like the ability to change the Payments graph by year. Also, it would be so helpful if you could drill down on the graphs to see what grants make up those amounts/payments.
3 votes -
Delete submitted follow-up without having to revert
It would be nice to be able to delete a submitted follow-up form without having to revert it back to Draft status.
1 vote -
Option to remove "See Opportunities" button
We would like to remove or deactivate the "See Opportunities" button on the left-hand To Do panel. All of our applicants can get to the apply page by clicking "Apply", and having more than one pathway creates confusion.
1 vote -
Accents / Insert symbol
It would be nice to be able to include accents in the response fields, without having to copy and paste from another document.
1 vote -
2-factor authentication
We would love the option to turn on 2-factor authentication. Applicants often share credentials to work on application and follow-up forms, and 2FA would help eliminate confusion on their end, as well as greatly reduce the risk of fraudulent activity.
1 vote -
Turn off ability for applicants to edit their contact information
We would really love the option to turn off applicant's ability to edit their own contact information. We have had problems with applicants changing names and email addresses during staff changes, and it creates huge problems with our record-keeping and historical data.
1 vote -
Melanie.Frazier@state.mn.us
For GLM under website settings, "Warn Applicant of an Existing Request," if this could be for applications submitted by organization. For example, a user from an organization submitted an application but then another user tries to apply for the same grant opportunity. The user trying to submit the 2nd application would be notified that an application was already submitted. There may be instances when there are multiple programs within one organization are applying for a grant, if that's the case, allow multiple programs to be identified under one umbrella organization.
1 vote -
Unique access codes
We would love access codes that can be made unique for each applicant, so that the code cannot be used more than once, and cannot be shared between potential applicants.
1 vote -
Melanie.Frazier@state.mn.us
Allow information from the organization and user details to auto-fill answers to questions in any form. For example, on the application form if the question is organization submitting an application that information would auto-populate based on the organization the user is linked to. Another example, would be if there is a question on the applicant form that asks who is completing the application, that information based on the user information of the person logged in.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?