988 results found
-
AI
I would love an option to batch generate AI Summaries from the dashboard in SLM. We have hundreds of applicants that create thousands of applications, this would be a great asset so we do not have to open each application to select this. Great time saver.
2 votesHi, Would love more feedback, would be helpful to batch run or just have these auto-created on submit?
-
follow up grant reports should be able to be assigned to all contacts of an org, or at least 2+ contacts
be able to assign grant reports to all contacts or multiple contacts of an org
9 votes -
Add ability to edit the subject line for email notification
Could we please add the ability to edit the subject line of the email notification? This would allow us to include a French translation where needed.
11 votes -
admin attach additional documents to slm request
I would like to propose adding functionality to the SLM Admin role to allow admins to attach documents to SLM opportunity requests that are not part of the application itself. For example, sometimes we receive letters of recommendation for students which have already been submitted by another recommender, or I have to compile some details about the student/situation that are pertinent to my reviewers' understanding of the application. It would be great to be able to hit an "attach a document" button within the Document Viewer to add an additional upload on that particular student's opportunity.
2 votes -
sanela.radoievici@greatermelbournefoundation.org.au
Completing a CSuite sync from Live to Sandbox breaks the integration with GLM sandbox. It would be extremely beneficial to have this integration re-establish automatically where there is a connection in live.
This avoids having to contact support each time a sync has been completed from CSuite Live to CSuite Sandbox.
2 votes -
Reporting on Pinned Comments
I know it is not currently possible to report on pinned comments, but if there is an opportunity to add that feature in the future it would greatly be appreciated. One of the main ways we used pinned comments is to make notes about previous grantees who have not submitted long, overdue reports or had another important interaction that it is helpful for all administrators to know.
It would be helpful to run a report on all the pinned comments so that we can know if we receive a future LOI, I can quickly review a report of all pinned…
2 votes -
jmize@durrfoundation.com
Please add the ability to export the history of grants made on the Requests Page to an Excel sheet. Currently, you cannot copy nor export, so I end up retyping the history for my board which is tedious and allows for errors in the data.
2 votes -
nmitchell@cfbroward.org
GLM - In the Eligibility Center it would be nice to have search options of First Name, Last Name, Eligibility Form, as well as Organization Name, to be able to see any submissions by anyone in the organization, (within a selected time frame).
2 votes -
Comments
I accidentally deleted a comment since I was not use to the new dashboard look and See More is sort of hidden in the preview of the comments. Foundant couldn't do anything to help. Would be great if there was a recently deleted or bold the See More.
5 votes -
Date auto format
Please allow a date to auto format when entering without dashes. For example, entering 080225 will automatically change to 08/02/2025. This happens in CSuite but not in GLM.
Thank you. TCF
14 votes -
AI Summary Reporting
I love the new feature for the AI Summary on LOIs & applications. However, I would like to be able to pull the AI Summary into a report or search.
Thank you.
2 votes -
Applicants to See Third Party Request Complete When Admin Uploads Letter
When third parties are assigned letters of recommendations for scholarship applications, sometimes they are not able to upload the letter themselves. Instead, a member of the scholarship administration team will upload the letter (which was emailed to us) on their behalf. Even when we upload the letter for them, it is still marked as incomplete from the applicants view of the application. It would be helpful if it was marked as complete if the letter was uploaded, whether or not it was uploaded by a third party.
[Repost of an archived idea, hoping to get traction!]
2 votes -
Follow Up are Yellow even after submission and marked Complete
Follow Ups are showing up as Yellow - even though the Follow Up Report was submitted and marked complete by the administrator. Visually it looks like the charity owes a report, but once you go in and look, you will see it has been submitted and marked complete. It's confusing. How about making it a different color (i.e., purple), and then it might remind administrators to close it out. Or add a separate button to close out the grant, or as someone may have mentioned to date-stamp to show when it was marked complete. The Yellow makes you think the…
2 votes -
Records per page
Option to have more than 100 but not ALL in the items per page picker. Often the filer results are into the hundreds but an ALL selection would be too many on a page.
2 votes -
Batch Download Email History
For organizations subject to Right to Know laws, being able to batch export a request's or a contact's email history would be hugely helpful. As it is, you cannot print out emails, you have to copy them into a separate document.
2 votes -
Public Fund Name
I have noticed in multiple template field lists that the use of the Fund Public Name is not an available option. To not have the Public Name available for all templates that have the Fund Name option defeats the purpose of the Public Name. It would be nice if the Public name was the default name used on templates or at least an option on all templates.
9 votes -
Score Field Improvements
Have 2 Score Fields in Reporting - one for LOI Evaluation Scores, and one for Grant Application Evaluation Scores. For Example, this would eliminate the need to filter out the scores when creating Reports for a process that has an LOI (because the current "Score" field combines the scores of the LOI and the Grant Application). Once the grant applications move onto the Evaluation stage, Board Members prefer scoring on the grant application because it's more current, and for Foundations like ours, we conduct in-person site visits, and Board Members are completing the Application Evaluations based on our site visit…
2 votes -
k.morris@mhjf.org
It would be helpful to have an "alternative organization name" field that would automatically be searched when searching for an organization by name. This would be usefull when an organization has had a name change or has multiple names. Thanks!
3 votes -
Customizable Administrator Dashboard
I would like to be able to add and remove buckets from the Open Requests section of the administrator dashboard. I have two different application processes, and I would like to quickly and easily see statuses for both of them on the dashboard, instead of having to click into application statuses, apply a filter to view one process, and then change the filter to view the other process.
3 votes -
Scoring Questions - Optional or Weighted
I was wondering if anyone would find value in the ability to weight evaluation questions. We are exploring the idea of funding general operating requests and project-based requests, all from one process. If we were able to weight questions or make some scoring questions optional, this would prevent and help us with our evaluation of LOIs and Applications.
9 votes
- Don't see your idea?