995 results found
-
Changing American spelling for Australian clients for Organization and Recognized
Changing American spelling for Australian clients for Organization and Recognized. (S instead of Z) Currently this is on the payment page for a donation but I am sure there are other spellings throughout the platform and GLM. For our Australian clients/donors it looks like we have spelt it wrong.
2 votes -
SLM UA Color
We have three SLM UA's that students can apply to and as it currently appears on a student's dashboard, all UA's are in the color blue. Is there a way that each UA has their own color. This will help with an inclusivity for color blindness.
2 votes -
track response to evaluation question
Can we add a feature to reporting to be able to pull responses to specific questions on the evaluation forms? I have a question that is an action item: Refer to Board, Ask for more info, or deny app.
I need a way to count the # of responses to this question by their answer. We use this + eval rubric score to assess the quality of the applications we receive. I've not been able to figure out how to pull this in the reporting module.
4 votes -
It would be helpful to have a grading mechanism at the organizational level; i.e.: consider strongly, consider, don't consider.
It would be helpful to have a grading mechanism at the organizational level; i.e.: consider strongly, consider, don't consider.
3 votes -
follow up due date entry field
It would help to eliminate the globe icon in the Due Date box. It takes up too much space and makes it difficult to see/enter the date you want.
3 votes -
GLM - Have Internal facing questions ommitted from the Copy Functionality when the Copy is performed by the Applicant
Having administrative Internal answers from a previous grant application (for example, we have in Internal question group where we provide additional information for our grant review committee) copy into a new grant application when the applicant is using the copy feature from their last cycle request is not ideal.
7 votes -
Submit Button that can be greyed out with "wrong answers" to questions
It would be nice on forms, if the Submit button can be greyed out if a specific answer to a question is selected. Or if we could select rules for the submit button much like branching questions.
1 voteHello Penny,
What sort of rules would like to see related to the submit button?
-
Hide (redact) personal info from reviewers.
We would really like to have the option to hide some of the personal information of the SLM applicants for reviewers. (addr, phone, email).
Be able to still show name, but not personal contact info.29 votes -
More than sum in table summaries
I need a table summary row that is a simple calculation, not just a sum.
Like A-B-C=D16 votes -
Adding organization name in Follow Ups
Our grant agreements in Follow Ups in Foundant GLM. We are looking to add the system Organization Name field in the follow up form. Since the available options on Follow Up forms don't allow me to pull system field info, I've had to ask for applicants to type "Organization Name" info on all applications just so that I can share this on the Follow Up (Grant Agreement). It would be easier if I could pull directly from the Org Info page on the follow up.
1 vote -
Evaluator 1 & 2 Required Question Flag
I would like to see Evaluator 1 & 2 forms have a hard stop if someone does not answer the required questions in their form. The same type of message applicants receive when they miss a question.
Currently, they can save the form and do not receive a warning they have missed any questions. Staff must check each evaluation to see if someone does not answer a question(s), call/email the evaluator, get them to log back into the system, complete the question(s), and we have to rerun our reports. It is very time consuming. Evaluators get cranky when they get…
1 vote -
Reviewer assignments -suggestion for reviewers to access app's at later date
It would be great to be able to assign reviewers to applications on X date, but for the reviewers to not be able to access the applications until a later date and time that could be set in Foundant.
1 vote -
merged templates default
Now that the software provides options of creating merge documents in Word or PDF, it would be nice to be able to set one as default or if the software defaulted to the last type used. Scrolling down to choose one gets tedious if you are doing many documents and you can't necessarily do them as a batch.
10 votes -
Batch add multiple Processes when assigning new Evaluators.
Batch add multiple Processes when assigning new Evaluators.
We've just discovered when trying to add in a new evaluator to our scholarship process, we have to add in every single scholarship opportunity separately as an individual process instead of being able to select "all", which, is what we need to do.
So our "Universe" of applications breaks down into "Processes" which are our individual scholarships and because we look at everything from the individual Student (and not the opportunities), we need to be able to batch multiple processes all at the same time.
The way things are currently set up,…
2 votes -
Copy responses in follow ups?
I recall there is a feature where applicants can copy responses from one application to another if we turn this on. Would you consider adding a copy feature for follow ups so applicants who need to complete multiple follow ups can copy responses from one follow up to another?
4 votes -
SLM Comment button position
Perhaps we leave an inordinate amount of comments (?) but it is driving me crazy that I have to scroll all the way to the bottom to hit the Add Comment button. Can that show up at the top instead.
Thank you for all your attention.1 vote -
Collapse blank table rows in packet PDFs
Currently, when I create a table that may have an unknown number of rows used (such as asking applicants to list the date, time, location of grant-funded events), I just have to guess at what might be the right number of rows to add. If an applicant only uses one row of 10 available, the application packet will still print all 10 rows and use up a lot of space. Can blank rows be collapsed in the application packet?
(Even better would be to allow applicants to add rows if needed, but I suspect that's more complicated.)
4 votes -
Mark an application that you would like to revisit
I would love to have the option to mark a submission/application as revisit. This is where we are not pursuing funds at this time, but we are interested enough to put their application in the "revisit" it will push it to the next cycle instead of flat out deny request.
2 votes -
Create the ability to recover deleted data sets from reports
Create the ability to recover deleted data sets.
2 votes -
EIN Prepopulating Organization Names
Would it be possible in the future for applicants to type in their EIN and it would prepopulate their Organization Name? It would help ensure that there aren't differences in spelling/format between organization names and would get rid of some steps for our merge template creation!
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?