896 results found
-
TABLES
Adding the column row total is wonderful, but there is a need to be able to subtotal them. I'm trying to create a financial report for my grantees to complete, and it would be nice to see the subtotal of the total column so they and I can know how much money is left in that particular category. Now, what I will have to do is export the table into Excel and create my formulas to subtotal and total the columns, which is, in my opinion, a huge waste of my time.
1 vote -
Pinned Comment - Author & Timestamp
When going in and pinning an existing comment (created before the "pinned comment" feature), it automatically changes the timestamp and author of the comment to whoever marked it as pinned. This doesn't make sense because the content of the comment itself hasn't changed. Pinning a comment shouldn't effect the author or date the original comment was made.
2 votes -
side by side text evaluations
The side-by-side view for evaluations does not properly show all of the text for 'text box' type questions. To see the rest of the text a user must manually select the text to make the box scroll - this is nonsensical or select the application button at the top creating a PDF popup.
Please make all the text show so that the evaluators can just have a side by side comparison and not have to open up multiple documents.
3 votes -
conflict of interest notification
I would love an automated email to administrators for GLM/SLM for a conflict of interest question. That way we can see it and assign another evaluator. We shoot for a certain number of reviews of applications and if someone has a conflict of interest we would want to assign a different reviewer for that application.
3 votes -
Payment Graph on Dashboard
On the Dashboard there's the Amount Awarded graph that posts the last 10 years. Our organization would love the Payments graph to show the same (last 10 years vs. last 12 months). Or, we'd like the ability to change the Payments graph by year. Also, it would be so helpful if you could drill down on the graphs to see what grants make up those amounts/payments.
3 votes -
IRS Pub78 Data actually NOT available in reporting
Hello from OKC! I've found a couple of threads that suggest it is possible to pull into a report all the fields available under the Charity Check > Publication 78 tab. I'm able to pull some but not all. I even chatted with support this morning just to make sure I'm not missing this. Specifically, I'd like to pull in the Organization Name field from the IRS Publication 78 tab within the CharityCheck module. I can pull the general org name field from the orgs profile (as they've entered it) but not the name as the IRS has it listed…
1 vote -
Picture add to contact page
In trying to build relationships with applicants, it would be very helpful to see their photo on their contact page. Could you make a field for the applicant to upload his/her photo on their contact page?
1 vote -
GLM Application Form - Preview Mode Very Confusing
Unfortunately, I’ve had a couple of organizations inadvertently fill out the questions on the application after clicking the “Preview” button on the Apply page instead of the “Apply”. This is super confusing and I was wondering if there is a way to “grey out” the fields in the preview version so that they cannot fill out the form. Or have clear warnings at the top or next to the questions. It’s been very time consuming for those thinking they have almost completed the application form only to realize it can’t be saved.
1 vote -
Request to make visual layout of LOI, App, Follow-ups, Documents Uploaded easier to follow
Documents: Forms and Files - challenging layout
In the new applicant experience, it appears the applicant will click on "Documents" to access their LOI, Application, follow-up forms, and any documents uploaded by the administrator. It seems confusing for the word "Documents" to encapsulate all of those aspects of the process. And then
it seems odd that "Forms" includes the LOI, the Application, and any of the follow-up forms. Perhaps it's just that I'm accustomed to thinking of those as separate parts of the process and thus should be put into their own buckets.
In the old experience, it's much easier…2 votes -
GA applicant list
Hello! In the SLM portal, applicant names for our Universe are only alphabetizable by first name. Please also include the ability to alphabetize the list within the portal by last name.
Thanks,
Rachael1 vote -
Remove an Applicant
I really need a way to remove an applicant without "abandoning" them or "denying" them. If I deny, they find out they didn't win the award. If I abandon, it goes to their request history, and then they can see it and email with questions. There are times we just need to remove them. An example would be: Our donor's evaluate, and one year there was an applicant in the pool for her son's memorial scholarship, that had bullied the deceased son. She came to us, and we needed to remove that applicant. There are instances where we just need…
1 vote -
AI Summary: Feedback
Please post your feedback on the new AI summary tool below!
2 votes -
Evaluation Score Export for Evaluators
It would be very helpful to have functionality built into the Evaluator role that allows each evaluator to download a quick export of all of their scores for each application. The custom columns feature does not allow for enough columns to be added so that all scores can be seen by each evaluator. Currently, Admins have to run reports of all scores and provide these to each individual evaluator so they can see all of their scores in one place.
1 vote -
Amount requested included in notification email
It would be helpful if the amount the organization is requesting would show up in the notification email. That way it's right there and you can look at it quickly rather than having to login.
6 votes -
Editable recognition name text box in Giving Hub
While processing online donations from the Giving Hub, I'm noticing that the "How do you want to be recognized" field is being misunderstood by many donors. It would be great if the text box verbiage was editable so we could change it to say something like -- "Optional: How do you want your name listed if different from above? (i.e. nickname)"
1 vote -
Sending Follow-Ups to Multiple contacts at an organization
Often with our grantees, we typically have multiple people working in tandem on different aspects of the report. While they are set up as collaborators, only one person is getting the reminder when upcoming reports are due. We would like to ensure that folks from departments such as the finance or program teams are all receiving the same advanced notice!
10 votes -
Display number of Applicant Opportunities selected
When building anything that applies to specific applicant opportunities (eligibility rules, scorecard questions and groups, application questions etc.) one must open the rule, select the Applicant Opportunites tab and scroll down a potentially very long list (133 and counting in our case) to verify which opportunities and how many have been selected. This allows a lot of room for error and creates uncertainty that the accurate number of opportunities has been selected prompting the builder to scroll up and down the list manually counting several times to verify.
It would be wildly helpful if the rule, group, or question displayed…
2 votes -
Wrapping text in Short Answer Questions
It would be great if text boxes wrapped in the application like the tables do now.
4 votes -
stock public securities principal
Stock Gift Adds Incorrect Amount to Principal Balance
The "initial" value a donor receives for a stock gift is DIFFERENT than the proceeds (also called in CSuite gross amount or net deposit). Please allow a field to enter the principal amount to be recorded for stock gifts.
For example...
Initial Value of Gift (receipt for donor) = $100,000
Gross Amount / Net Deposit - Proceeds to Fund (once the stock is sold) = $95,000
The fund receiving the stock gift is immediately underwater because $100,000 is recorded to the CSuite principal but the fund balance is $95,000.1 vote -
Clarify Require Right Digit -actually make it require the number specified
Our GPA question asks for 2 digits after the decimal point and we have "require right digits" turned on, but students are still able to submit a GPA with only one digit after the decimal point.
Foundant support said "I learned from our technical engineering team that the functionality is working as expected. The way the number of digits after the decimal works is similar to a maximum character count. As you've entered it in your application, there can be up to two decimal points. When clicking require right digits it means there has to be something entered up to…
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?