1024 results found
-
History for comments under org profile
We keep comments for several organizations in the organization profile. If a comment is accidentally deleted, there is no way to get it back. A history of previous comments would be super helpful, like how the change log shows up for the org.
6 votes -
SLM UA Review Process
It would be very helpful to have an additional status between “Application Submitted” and “Application Complete.”
Our organization manages more than 300 scholarship opportunities, and when a student submits an application, the system automatically tests their responses against the eligibility rules for each scholarship. However, if staff discover an error while reviewing the application, correcting it becomes a complicated process.
Currently, we must re-test the applicant to determine whether they still qualify for the same scholarships. If the corrected information changes their eligibility, staff then have to manually remove or deny those scholarships. This creates additional work and can be…1 vote -
Expand Email interface/targeting in SLM
Current Limitation
As I understand it, SLM users can send a batch email by filtering students within Open Requests. While helpful, it only exposes a limited set of fields. Meaningful segmentation often requires additional reportable fields, custom responses, or workflow-driven data points that are not available in the Open Requests filter. As a result, users frequently must export, manually filter outside the system, and email students separately.
Proposed Enhancement: Criteria-Based Emailing Using Full Reportable Fields
Introduce the ability to send an email directly within SLM using any reportable field, not just the limited filter options in Open Requests.
Core Concept…1 vote -
Stop report from running until all filters are added.
I have a few reports with large data sets (160 rows, 66 columns) and include several filters. Each time I add a filter I have to wait for the form to add the filter and reload the data. It takes several minutes. I would like to see a feature where I can add all the filters I need and then click a button to run the report. Can we pause the report from running until we are ready?
10 votes -
brandy.thrower@arkansas.gov
The new Organization Summary for administrators is missing the "organization email history". Viewing the email history is necessary in my documentation process.
4 votes -
batch draft approvals and conditional approval status option
For our processes it would be helpful to have the option for a "conditionally approved" status that lies between regular "draft approved" and "approved". Also being able to make batch actions on any of these three levels of approval is also ideal.
1 vote -
batch print award email notifications
Hello, for our auditing purposes, it is helpful for us to be able to batch print pdf's or once big pdf of the email notifications of awards. Additionally, it would be best if that has a time stamp on it as well for date sent as that is part of the critical data. When you view individual email correspondence you don't see that information, only when looking up the email history in the tab drop down. Right now I have to copy them all and put them into Excel or Google Sheets and then make a pdf.
1 vote -
We would like the capabilities to delete organizations and users so we can clean up our GLM database.
We currently have an organization that we cannot delete due to a charity check that was conducted. Although this organization has no requests or contacts associated with it, the charity check issue prevents us from removing it. We also would like to have the ability to delete old users who are not tied to our grant applications, not just make them inactive. We currently do not use a CRM program and have used GLM as our main source for data.
4 votes -
GLM: Block new application if grant report isn't complete
Block new application from applicant who hasn't completed a grant report on a previous grant award. This would encourage applicants to complete their grant report and provide another level of due diligence built into GLM
88 votesThank you for the idea.
Would you hope this is implemented across all processes?
-
SLM/UA Decision: Waitlist
It would be nice to have a section on the admin dashboard that allows applications to be marked as 'alternates' so they don't have to remain in the 'evaluations closed' section. As the site is now, there is no way to hold an application as an alternate other than leaving it in the evaluations closed status.
1 vote -
Automatic email FROM our evaluators once they have completed an evaluation
We should be able to receive an automatic email from our evaluators once they have completed an evaluation. This would be a time-saving program enhancement for scholarship management.
4 votes -
Spelling/Grammar Check Tool in SLM Scholarship Applications
It would be helpful for SLM to include a spelling/grammar check tool within the scholarship applications for students to use when writing their essays or short answer responses. I know that some internet browsers have a spell check included, but it might be helpful from the student side to have a more comprehensive tool to help with spelling, grammar, etc. as they write their responses.
34 votes -
SLM Lite version as an option for GLM
An SLM Lite version available for GLM users that only have a few (2) scholarships. It could possibly be offered as a 2+2 option for advanced licenses.
2 votes -
Third Party Dashboard - Request with Common Opportunities
Looking for a way that when someone goes into their 3rd party dashboard, they can see all the processes/opportunities that are grouped together and will be marked complete when they upload an item. See example of possible format attached.
2 votes -
Allow "Other: _____" Text option at the end of Checkbox questions
Every other form builder application allows you to add an "Other: _____" text box at the end of Checkbox questions. It's a simple way to catch exceptions that you're not thinking of.
51 votes -
Organization Summary page
Why not add Amount Requested to the new Organization Summary page along with the the Closed (previous) commitments.
2 votesHi Mark, Thank you for the feedback. The one tricky part about requested amount is that it is a custom field and not a system field in 2026 we may be looking at how we can create more system fields, or creating coding that would help us know what fields are similar across clients to use in scenarios like this.
-The Foundant Team
-
Let Grantees Submit SOME Follow Ups Out of Order
I understand that there is a feature that allows follow ups to be submitted either sequentially or in any order. This is helpful if you want all follow ups to follow the same rules. However, we need most of our follow ups to be submitted sequentially, and then just a couple of them to be able to be submitted at any time.
We have deadlines for each of our follow ups, but applicants are welcome to submit certain follow ups with a later deadline (i.e. match documentation) before the others (a final grant report, for example, which we do 3…
5 votes -
applied button
The "applied (with check mark)" is confusing our grantees. Grantees can make multiple applications to the same process. They have no idea that "Applied" means they have the correct application submitted. Can you change "Applied" to "Apply". The following page warns them of duplicates anyway. Why confuse things.
3 votes -
Internal follow-up assignment visibility
Submitted on behalf of a client:
I would like the existence of internal follow ups to be visible on the applicant's dashboard. Even if they can't see the information in the internal follow up, the lack of visibility/availability for the client interferes with sequential follow up assignment. Internal/applicant visibility should be a separate issue from interna/applicant assignment.
It would be good if an applicant could see that there is an internal follow up assigned associated with their request. This visibility could be controlled via a setting toggle.
1 vote -
Evaluator experience
When using the text box option for answers requiring no more than 250 characters, the text is cut off when evaluators use side-by-side functionality. The workaround is for the evaluator to drag the dotted line dividing the sections to the left, but that is cumbersome and time-consuming. It would be nice to have these short responses automatically wrap when displaying during side-by-side evaluations like the questions that use 'text area' for more than 250 character responses.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?