1040 results found
- 
GLM/QBO Integration Chart of AccountsOur GLM site is linked to QuickBooks Online through the new integration. In the Account drop down list on the Installment Form, the one Chart of Account account we charge grant payments to is not included in the list. There are 46 accounts that we can select from....just not the one expense account that we charge all grant payments to! 
 I would like to be able to have our grant account added to the list of available accounts and the other accounts deleted.1 vote
- 
Allow "Committee Evaluators" to view all applications in a process- not just the ones they are assigned to evaluateIt is impossible for every committee member to evaluate every submitted application, yet all the committee members are making the decisions when it comes time to vote on grant approvals and declinations. Instead of creating and sharing a report with everyone, it would be great it they had access to "view only" or "read only" all the applications that were submitted but not assigned to them to evaluate so that they aren't hearing about an application for the first time at the grants meeting when it's time to make decisions. 1 vote
- 
Email template logicIt would be so useful to be able to incorporate logic into email templates. If I could have one sentence if a certain condition is true, and another if it's not, would save me from having to create (and maintain!) a multitude of templates. 3 votes
- 
Admin Editing of LOI/Application Form Fields During Evaluation ProcessWe'd be grateful if there was a way for the admin to edit LOIs/applications from within the evaluation process (ie. the double-pane view), without having to back out into the org's overview and click in from there to edit the form (and then click back into evaluation mode to get to the next form). We have some internal review fields attached to the LOI, rather than to the LOI evaluation, so that we can carry those fields forward to subsequent parts of the process and have them copied into subsequent processes. We use these fields for tracking demographic and sector… 2 votes
- 
Allow evaluators to track the amount of money they have spent as they are going through applicationsWe have had several evaluators ask for there to be a way to see the amount of money they have recommended be allocated in total as they are going through all of the applications they have been assigned. As we give them a budget for each process, this would be helpful in seeing how close they are getting to that budget. 3 votesThis workflow can be accomplished today using custom columns with Aggregation. Contact support or success to learn more. -sammie 
- 
"Close Request" buttonThe "close request" button has caused confusion for our staff. It's being clicked accidentally. As you go through the scholarship workflow, you often click the buttons in the bottom right corner. The Close Request button is located in the bottom right, but is not a button we want clicked. I also think using the word Closed is not the right word to use. Could the button be moved and the name changed to indicate something more drastic? "Close" can sound like you are just finishing this particular step in the process. Thank you! 3 votes
- 
elizabeth@oshkoshareacf.orgAdding a description field under the Vouchers tab in the new or old Fund Advisor Portal (similar to how it is listed under the Donations tab). 2 votes
- 
Amicable Divorce for Eligibility Quiz & ProcessWe have a number of pretty straightforward eligibility criteria that apply for all potential grantees. We would like for grantees to be able to take the eligibility quiz at any and all times. A quiz is a more dynamic option than asking people to read through a bunch of text which they often choose not to do. If their results lead them to a custom pass/fail message, according to their answers, and the road ends there, we will be thrilled. For our administrative process, the scenario where a potential applicant fails and still chooses to submit an application is easier… 2 votes
- 
Limit Primary Contact Selection to AdministratorsWe would like to prevent applicants from selecting the primary contact. We love that applicants can now invite their colleagues to join their org. If we can make a small tweak so that they cannot select who the primary contact is, that would be really helpful. Our specific usage example: We use the primary contact to indicate who is at the helm of the organization (ex: this allows us to use the primary contact as a merge field in documents that address the ED/CEO). The word "primary" is confusing to applicants - they think it indicates who is the primary… 2 votes
- 
Org ProfilesAutomated Data Synchronization: Establish automatic syncing of relevant data between GLM and our main systems. This would ensure that updates in GLM reflect in real-time, reducing manual data entry and minimizing errors. 
 Identical Profiles:Ensure that the profiles in C-Suite and GLM Org are identical, containing all the same required information. This uniformity will simplify data management and ensure consistency across both platforms. 
 User Suggestions for Profile Changes:Allow organizations, grantees, and other stakeholders to suggest changes to their main profiles through their portal accounts. This feature will enable them to keep their information up to date and ensure accuracy.… 1 vote
- 
Close Request Button Design IssueI inadvertently Closed our scholarship recipients when I went through the old applications in order to update contact info. They have to be kept in approved to pull up by group; Closed applications can only be accessed one by one. The Close Request button is on the bottom right where it's common to find a button to leave a form/web page or an X on the upper right. Foundant has neither for users. You have to go to the Home icon, Requests & Users option, or the back arrow. It's not good user layout. Move the Close Request to the… 4 votes
- 
revert statusI'd like to request more control over the "Revert Status" function in SLM. Batch revert capability would be wonderful, and also the ability to choose from any stage in the cycle to revert to rather than having to revert one step at a time (i.e. from denied to denial draft, then from denial draft to complete). 3 votes
- 
Pull Opportunity Info or Flag Questions into Follow Up FormsWhen creating Follow Up forms, it would be a real time-saver, and lessen the likelihood of error, to be able to pull information or fields from the Applicant Opportunities section of the Universe into the follow up form. (Or even from the connected CSuite Scholarship.) Currently, each opportunity we have has its own initial acceptance follow up form where the student must certify they still meet that scholarship's criteria, and we have to manually copy/paste that criteria into the follow up form from the Applicant Description section of the Opportunities page, or the scholarship description in CSuite. To take it… 3 votes
- 
Add "grant manager" assignments report fieldAllow us to pull a list of the "grant manager" assignments for all assigned requests by adding a data field under "Processes" and "Requests" in report data sets. I'd like to be able to pull a report of which staff member is assigned to each request. Currently, I have to proxy as each staff member to pull each list individually. 5 votes
- 
reneamuellerleile@rosenaufoundation.orgEnable administration of a "blinded" review without having to update Application form multiple times (i.e., visibility of questions for Applicant, visibility for Evaluation 1 blinded review, visibility for Evaluation 2 unblinded). Since there is one Application form ("master") this is very challenging and presents potential for errors. 1 vote
- 
sort by last name in SLMIt would be very helpful to be able to sort by last name withing SLM. Being only able to sort by First name is a challenge. 2 votes
- 
project managementWhat would really help us (and I'm not sure in which category to include this idea) would be a tab that allows for a project management view for administrators & reviewers. More specifically, to visualize where we are in the different steps of the process after approval of the proposal: recommendation sent to Board; Board approved; grant agreement prepared. This would really help our team to see where in the grant management process we are. Or is this already available and haven't I found it yet? 2 votes
- 
mergeable fields of internal staff membersInclude mergeable fields to be used in templates and reporting based on the staff member assigned to the request. Currently, there are only merged fields for the applicant assigned to the request, not the internal staff member. 2 votes
- 
mergeable fields based on specific request installmentsInclude mergeable fields based on specific request installments (currently this is all installments or the first installment). This will enable us to easily create a cheque request form based on the upcoming installment that needs to be paid. 2 votes
- 
drop the 2 factor verification for the scholarship application processI am having a hard time getting Latino scholarship applicants because it takes 2 factor verification to get into the system. Most of our Latino students do not have cell phones or computers at home so it is difficult for them to apply 1 vote
- Don't see your idea?
