645 results found
-
Opportunity Name Merge on Shared Supplemental Questions
It would be nice to have a 'merge template' concept included in the supplemental questions so that applicants see "[Scholarship Opportunity Name] Supplemental Questions" when they are working on each opportunity. This will help them remember which set of supplemental questions they are completing when they may have multiple opportunities still open.
1 vote -
Remove "Rating" as a required field for Evaluations
Remove the Rating system from Evaluations as a required field.
Our Evaluations never show as Complete even when they are because we do not use a rating system to evaluate grants.1 vote -
Using Multiple Docusign accounts
When sending documents through DocuSign via Foundant we want to let multiple people be able to do it. At the moment Foundant only allows it to be connected to one account so other people are not able to receive the documents that they sent out on DocuSign. If there was a way to have separate Foundant accounts connected to different DocuSign keys.
1 vote -
Set defaults to have Active and Inactive profiles searched in GLM/SLM
When searching for users on GLM/SLM, the "Active" box is automatically pre-checked for "User Status".
Adding a setting so that both Active and Inactive are pre-checked when searching for users would be helpful so that you don't forget to check "Inactive".
1 vote -
Collapse blank table rows in packet PDFs
Currently, when I create a table that may have an unknown number of rows used (such as asking applicants to list the date, time, location of grant-funded events), I just have to guess at what might be the right number of rows to add. If an applicant only uses one row of 10 available, the application packet will still print all 10 rows and use up a lot of space. Can blank rows be collapsed in the application packet?
(Even better would be to allow applicants to add rows if needed, but I suspect that's more complicated.)
1 vote -
Move Save Summary button above process description
After more than 6 years at Foundant, I still forget to click Save Summary when editing process summary bc it is usually out of my line of sight. Clients do this all the time. Moving it into line of vision would really help people not lose changes.
1 vote -
Create Documents - Form Name instead of Form Type
Currently, when you go to Create Documents and Choose File Uploads, the second column displays Form Type (Followup) for all of the documents, instead of Form Name (specific follow-ups like Interim Report or Final Report).
We'd love to be able to see Form Name to know which follow-up form we are selecting, as we print out interim reports for review before sending our next grant installment.1 vote -
Show Merge documents in alphabetical order
On the "Merge Templates" page, it would be helpful if we could arrange and view the merge documents in order by column header, specifically by date or alphabetically.
1 vote -
Add DocuSign "bucket" to Dashboard
I'd like to have a DocuSign bucket/status box added to the DashBoard, just like the buckets for all other forms and their statuses (LOI, Applicaiton... FollowUps, etc.) to ease tracking the status of our grant agreements.
1 vote -
Sub-subtotals in Tables
The addition of the subtotal function within tables is great, but more is needed for it to be compatible with my workflow. In particular, I would like to be able to have a subtotal that captures other subtotals.
For example, I have one grant that has three funding categories, and one non-funding category. I can subtotal each of the three funding categories, but it won't let me then see a subtotal of those three added together, only the total of the three funding categories plus the non-funding category (which I also need, but I want to see both). Otherwise I…
1 vote -
Better tables with predefined choices for columns.
Often I have a series of yes/no questions that might be easier or less intimidating to an applicant if they were in a single table. While I know that I can create that using a drop down menu, it would require less of the system, and potentially move faster if it were a choice for a column setting. The same concept (creating a column setting) would also be useful to number rows that data is entered in.
1 vote -
Make merging documents as easy as using merge for batch emails
Please make merging documents as easy as using merge for batch emails. It's ridiculous after all these years that the workflow for doing this is still so clunky.
1. download the field codes
2. make sure you no to answer "No" when the popup comes up
3. copy and paste the codes into the template in Word
4. upload the template
5. go to Requests and Decisions and search for the appropriate requests and decisions, and
6. create the documents.1 vote -
Include Applicant/User Registration information as a shared question
It would be helpful for grant agreements to be able to have the organization and user registration information available to populate the agreement form. Otherwise they need to be entered again to have a stand-alone document.
1 vote -
Shared ANSWERS within an application
It would be helpful to have answers that were selected earlier from a drop down list be able to carry over to another part of the application.
Totals from tables carrying over to a budget summary table would also be useful.1 vote -
Tax Class from GLM to CSuite
I'm not sure if this is a CSuite or a GLM idea. Why isn't the tax class field a standard field in GLM so when you sync the grant you do not have to remember to edit the profile? We end up with a lot of agencies without a tax class when it is time to run the 990 reports. Very time consuming.
1 vote -
Running Total in Evalutation Form
It would be beneficial if evaluators could track the approved grant amount per organization while they are evaluating the applications. Having an in-system ability to track the running total amount of funds being granted would decrease the chance of the evaluators going over or under the total budget allotted for the whole grant cycle.
1 vote -
Primary contact
Hello, I know that this has been proposed once. I'd like to be able to have an option of not choosing a primary contact for the organization. In cases where different departments are involved with different projects a primary contact sometimes creates confusion on follow-up/reporting forms. Appreciate your advice. Thank you
1 vote -
Hide applicant followups on evaluator dashboard
We have quite a few users who act as both applicants and evaluators at different times. There is a lot of confusion when they log in and see their applicant followups (grant contracts, reports) on their evaluator dashboard. Many then end up filling out the forms from the evaluator dashboard, but then find they don't have an option to submit. Is there a way to just not have these followups show up on the evaluator dashboard?
1 vote -
One collaborator for multiple organizations' requests
We have a very hands-on grant committee who wants to walk the applicants through the process with support to help them be successful in the grantmaking process. We're using the "collaborator" feature so the grant committee can provide feedback to the applicant before they submit their grant proposal. When Proxying in as the collaborator, the dashboard only shows the name of the project/program and does not show the name of the applicant organization until you click Edit to get into their application. My request is that the Dashboard shows the name of the organization per request also.
1 vote -
access code
Add the ability to add an access code to a universal application
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?