1040 results found
-
Date Question Type Formatting Options
I do see this was brought up in years past, but was hoping to renew interest in the topic. It would be great when using the Date question type to be able to select the format in which you would like that date provided. It would be great to be able to ask for a month and year, for example, especially when asking for degree conferral dates, where a specific day is often not known.
8 votes -
Hide Score Column on the Evaluator Dashboard
We definitely need the ability to add at least three custom columns - 2 is just too few. But while we are limited in the number of columns we can add, it is heartbreaking to have a precious Evaluator column wasted on a system column we don't use. Additionally, because this particular column is there we can't use the Scoring question type, because it will populate this columns with numbers that won't mean anything to our Evaluators and will confuse them. We rank on a 1 through 4 scale with 1 the highest and 4 the lowest - only the…
1 vote -
Permissions for Grants Managers to upload shared files
Giving the permission to upload shared files/documents to Grants Managers.
2 votes -
Shared Question across processes
We have a question used in several processes. I propose a question maintained in the process manager than can be added to multiple processes. We would have one location to maintain the response options for simplicity/authority. It would also streamline reporting metrics with uniform answers for comparison.
8 votes -
We are part of a Regional Association of Grant Makers. Most of us use Foundant. one master login would be ideal.
One master login and password for any applicant. We are part of a RAG. Most use Foundant. It would be great if the applicants could log in once to get to all grant makers. One more step to a single application.
1 vote -
Printing application & Returning to saved application
From one of our grantees:
When saving application DRAFTS, it would be easier and save us time if the application returned to the question that we were last writing rather than to a separate page where we then need to return to the top of the application page and find the question where we left off.
Also, if we could print the DRAFT applications directly, rather than downloading a PDF first, that would again be a timesaver.
1 vote -
Allow "Committee Evaluators" to view all applications in a process- not just the ones they are assigned to evaluate
It is impossible for every committee member to evaluate every submitted application, yet all the committee members are making the decisions when it comes time to vote on grant approvals and declinations. Instead of creating and sharing a report with everyone, it would be great it they had access to "view only" or "read only" all the applications that were submitted but not assigned to them to evaluate so that they aren't hearing about an application for the first time at the grants meeting when it's time to make decisions.
1 vote -
Admin Editing of LOI/Application Form Fields During Evaluation Process
We'd be grateful if there was a way for the admin to edit LOIs/applications from within the evaluation process (ie. the double-pane view), without having to back out into the org's overview and click in from there to edit the form (and then click back into evaluation mode to get to the next form). We have some internal review fields attached to the LOI, rather than to the LOI evaluation, so that we can carry those fields forward to subsequent parts of the process and have them copied into subsequent processes. We use these fields for tracking demographic and sector…
2 votes -
Enhancing GLM and SLM through ERP Integration
To enhance GLM and SLM, consider integrating more advanced ERP system functionalities into the platforms. By incorporating features like real-time data analytics, automated reporting, and seamless integration with other ERP modules, you can significantly improve efficiency and accuracy. For instance, implementing automated data syncing between GLM/SLM and ERP financial systems could reduce manual data entry errors and provide more accurate insights into grant and contract management. Additionally, incorporating AI-driven analytics could help users identify trends and optimize their strategies based on real-time data, leading to more informed decision-making and streamlined operations.
ERP recommendation: https://www.impactfirst.co/id/erp/software-erp
4 votes -
elizabeth@oshkoshareacf.org
Adding a description field under the Vouchers tab in the new or old Fund Advisor Portal (similar to how it is listed under the Donations tab).
2 votes -
commas in budget table
I like the embedded tables for the most part but I really need commas in those integer cells and the sum total cell.
8 votes -
operations account aggregator
We would like an account aggregator that feeds directly from our main bank account into our general ledger (or someplace). We have missed transactions (due to human error) and this would prevent us from missing transactions that occur in our checking account.
1 vote -
docusign
Is it on the radar for enabling the DocuSign to be sent to the primary contact instead of the applicant?
3 votes -
kbakhshi@fmscleveland.com
When creating a document and when viewing the Merge Docs on the communications page, they are not sortable. I wish the list was alphabetized, or sortable. Right now we have to scroll through dozens of templates.
6 votes -
Export Images
We need a way to export the images in a report/as a batch for our annual reports. These images are uploaded in our final report form.
6 votes -
Evaluations
When evaluators are assigned to grant applications making sure the mandatory fields are completed, if not, giving them an alert before they can submit/finish.
6 votes -
Hide Abandoned Applications
A site (or process) wide setting that allows us to hide abandoned applications would be helpful. Our board/evaluators are confused if they see this information in the request history tab or in print packets. We delete it but would prefer for it to show on the applicants' side and remain as a historical record.
6 votes -
Amicable Divorce for Eligibility Quiz & Process
We have a number of pretty straightforward eligibility criteria that apply for all potential grantees. We would like for grantees to be able to take the eligibility quiz at any and all times. A quiz is a more dynamic option than asking people to read through a bunch of text which they often choose not to do.
If their results lead them to a custom pass/fail message, according to their answers, and the road ends there, we will be thrilled.
For our administrative process, the scenario where a potential applicant fails and still chooses to submit an application is easier…
2 votes -
Limit Primary Contact Selection to Administrators
We would like to prevent applicants from selecting the primary contact.
We love that applicants can now invite their colleagues to join their org. If we can make a small tweak so that they cannot select who the primary contact is, that would be really helpful.
Our specific usage example: We use the primary contact to indicate who is at the helm of the organization (ex: this allows us to use the primary contact as a merge field in documents that address the ED/CEO). The word "primary" is confusing to applicants - they think it indicates who is the primary…
2 votes -
Request History as an Internal Form Field
The request history table in the print packet is so helpful. Board members and evaluators really like to have a quick snapshot of this information.
It would be great if we could
1) pull this table into application or evaluation form as an internal field or
2) create a field with the option to make request history pop out as an external window
or any solution that offers a simple way to have eyes on request history to those folks who spend little time in the database and don't feel comfortable with extra clicksThank you!
10 votes
- Don't see your idea?