1087 results found
-
Thoughts on Renewable Scholarships
As a scholarship admin, I want a way to communicate with students about the renewal requirements for an opportunity within the system.
- can do with email types, but it requires lots of manual workAs a scholarship admin, I want to remove the human review of follow-up forms to verify renewal eligibility.
I want to set rules for if a follow-up should be marked complete and if they don't does it kick back to draft, email the students, etc.
Examples of eligibility criteria for renewal
- GPA
- School
- Major7 votes -
Header Image on Eligibility Quizzes
We'd like the Header Image to be visible on Eligibility Quizzes.
The header becomes visible once the applicant completes and passes an eligibility quiz but not before.
Having our logos appear on the Apply page displaying the available Eligibility Quizzes would be a nice addition to the new updates.
2 votes -
Prevent Duplicate Applications in GLM
Please consider only allowing one application per process by each organization. I saw duplicate application from single applicant most of the time. I would be greatly appreciate if it is fixed soon.
2 votes -
Primary Contact Descriptor
Could there be a small pop-up when your cursor goes over this field that explains how the primary contact works?
Our applicants often think "primary contact" indicates who will receive communications about their application. They frequently email saying they kept trying to change the primary contact and were unsuccessful.
We would like applicants to know that
1) the primary contact is the executive director/officer
2) site administrators control who is the primary contact
3) all communications are sent to the user that submitted an applicationThanks for your suggestions on how best to make this information clear to applicants!
Kira…
8 votes -
batch create voucher from custom reports
because in the grants module under the voucher bucket, you can't maintain custom filtering that can be used over and over, it would be great to be able to batch approve payments and batch create vouchers from the custom reports module.
1 vote -
Ability to have customize Message when event is sold out
In the GivingHub event registration flow, it would be great to be able to customize the message when it is sold out. Or preventing registration on the main page by disabling the button so a message can say, contact us to get on the waitlist.
1 vote -
We would like the capabilities to delete organizations and users so we can clean up our GLM database.
We currently have an organization that we cannot delete due to a charity check that was conducted. Although this organization has no requests or contacts associated with it, the charity check issue prevents us from removing it. We also would like to have the ability to delete old users who are not tied to our grant applications, not just make them inactive. We currently do not use a CRM program and have used GLM as our main source for data.
5 votes -
UA - administrator visibility of amount spendable per opportunity
I've heard more than one client that it would be helpful to have a space in SLM/UA to track the spendable amount of each opportunity (similar to the process budget). The clients would use this question to track amounts awarded against the spendable balance to know "where they are" in the balance. If this could integrate from CSuite, that would be even better, but non-integrated clients have also asked for this so ideally, it's something that needs either option.
2 votes -
Applicants should be able to receive a confirmation email once they have had to resubmit an application.
As of now, if an applicant has to resubmit an application due to it being deemed incomplete, they can not receive a second confirmation email. This is critical, especially for smaller organizations, as it saves time and reassures applicants that their resubmittal has been processed.
1 vote -
Automatic email FROM our evaluators once they have completed an evaluation
We should be able to receive an automatic email from our evaluators once they have completed an evaluation. This would be a time-saving program enhancement for scholarship management.
4 votes -
Flag application questions that still need completing
Applicant requested a navigation or flag for questions that still need to be completed.
1 vote -
We are liking the new Org Summary page and are wondering if any modifications are allowed? For example, for each request if the follow up ha
We are liking the new Org Summary page and are wondering if any modifications are allowed? For example, for each request if the follow up has been submitted or closed, can it state that instead of them all saying follow up assigned? It is not helpful to have that if it isn't totally accurate info. I noticed that even if all the reports are closed, it still says follow up assigned and that is frustrating.
2 votes -
Evaluations: Availability of "White Board" common space for evaluators
Our grant committee has multiple times requested the ability for evaluators to have a "white board" type space in the evaluation process that they each can communicate with each other and ask raise questions about the grantee being reviewed so that all evaluators viewing that grantee could see what questions/clarifications are needed for that particular grantee. Right now, they communicate through me as the program manager and cannot communicate with each other through the software.
1 vote -
Show 'default' balance on face of fund record
Consider adding the default (earnings) balance to the face of the fund record, at the top with the rest of the balances. Working in Finance, I have gotten questions about why the fund balance is different from the principal and other similar inquiries. The data exists and the account exists, so it should be easily implemented.
4 votes -
Let Grantees Submit SOME Follow Ups Out of Order
I understand that there is a feature that allows follow ups to be submitted either sequentially or in any order. This is helpful if you want all follow ups to follow the same rules. However, we need most of our follow ups to be submitted sequentially, and then just a couple of them to be able to be submitted at any time.
We have deadlines for each of our follow ups, but applicants are welcome to submit certain follow ups with a later deadline (i.e. match documentation) before the others (a final grant report, for example, which we do 3…
5 votes -
applicant dashboard
On the applicant dashboard, it would be helpful in Historical to show by default (without needing to expand) the status of the request. From the applicant's perspective, it's key to know if a request was denied, approved and completed, or abandoned. It's nice to see immediately what was successful and what was not. The arrow to expand next to the category heading is not clear.
1 vote -
applied button
The "applied (with check mark)" is confusing our grantees. Grantees can make multiple applications to the same process. They have no idea that "Applied" means they have the correct application submitted. Can you change "Applied" to "Apply". The following page warns them of duplicates anyway. Why confuse things.
5 votes -
Committees for Evaluation in GLM
It would be nice to have a Committee option in GLM, like SLM, for evaluators. We utilize the portal for different processes throughout the year including accepting nominations for an awards event we host. It would be helpful to use a committee option when assigning evaluators.
5 votes -
Make it possible to delete or hide sections of the dashboard that are no longer relevant
It is currently impossible to get rid of a section of the dashboard once you have used it in some of your applications. In our case, we used to have an LOI as part of our application process. We got rid of that over 5 years ago, and yet to this day two large boxes on our staff dashboard screen are taken up by a process that hasn't been relevant in close to a decade.
2 votes -
Add Multiple Users to a Request
If multiple users in the system are involved with a request, allow for the request be cross-listed under both/all user accounts. Similarly to collaboration, users will be able to work together on an application, but the request will then appear in both/all users' request histories.
10 votes
- Don't see your idea?