983 results found
-
Show number of users assigned to process
Add an icon or label to or near the 'Assign Users' button (on the Update Process page) to indicate how many users are currently assigned to the process.
4 votes -
follow
We recently implemented a quarterly report for one of our grants - it would be great if there was a way to assign the same follow up more than once rather than creating a copy of the report for each quarter.
4 votes -
custom fields on evaluator dashboard
GLM - It would be great to be able to add more than just one custom field to the evaluator dashboard.
4 votesHello,
You can add to two custom field on the evaluator dashboard. Do you need more than that?
If please explain what you are sharing and if there are standard fields that would not need displayed.
-
Customize Project Name Field
I would love to be able to edit the "Project Name" Field for our evaluators. Right now I change the "Project Name" within the application, but for our evaluators, the bar still reads "Project Name"
4 votes -
Third Evaluation Option
It would be helpful to have more than 2 evaluation options for Universal Applications. Scholarship Opportunities vary vastly in what is important. Being able to have the Internal Evaluation and a choice of either the complex or simple evaluation form for the 2nd choice would be most helpful!
4 votes -
Transfer of info to next year's application
Some of our scholarships are available to students already in college, so they can apply multiple years in a row. It would therefore be nice to provide a feature in the SLM universal application in which they can transfer certain items/ answers from one year's universal app to another. This would save them time. Perhaps we could determine what we would allow to be transferred when we set up each new universal app, or what questions MUST be answered by all. Again, time saver for returning applicants.
4 votes -
track response to evaluation question
Can we add a feature to reporting to be able to pull responses to specific questions on the evaluation forms? I have a question that is an action item: Refer to Board, Ask for more info, or deny app.
I need a way to count the # of responses to this question by their answer. We use this + eval rubric score to assess the quality of the applications we receive. I've not been able to figure out how to pull this in the reporting module.
4 votes -
Copy responses in follow ups?
I recall there is a feature where applicants can copy responses from one application to another if we turn this on. Would you consider adding a copy feature for follow ups so applicants who need to complete multiple follow ups can copy responses from one follow up to another?
4 votes -
Collapse blank table rows in packet PDFs
Currently, when I create a table that may have an unknown number of rows used (such as asking applicants to list the date, time, location of grant-funded events), I just have to guess at what might be the right number of rows to add. If an applicant only uses one row of 10 available, the application packet will still print all 10 rows and use up a lot of space. Can blank rows be collapsed in the application packet?
(Even better would be to allow applicants to add rows if needed, but I suspect that's more complicated.)
4 votes -
Include Applicant/User Registration information as a shared question
It would be helpful for grant agreements to be able to have the organization and user registration information available to populate the agreement form. Otherwise they need to be entered again to have a stand-alone document.
4 votes -
Telephone Number
It would be nice to have a 'phone number' question type to select when creating an application so that the applicant doesn't have to worry about how to format their phone number when entering it. Something like --xxxx would be great so that every phone number entry followed the same formating.
4 votes -
Ability turn off automatic e-mails for individual requests
We often have to turn off automatic e-mails for short period of times when we work on individual requests and do not want the applicant to receive a notification.
Sometimes, we forget to turn the automatic e-mail back on in the tool manager and it creates confusion.
It would be great to be able to toggle off (an on) automatic e-mails for an individual request, directly in the request.
4 votes -
metrics dashboard - permissions
It would be great if administrators could permit other users (eg board members) access to the metrics dashboard. It is a great summary of the foundation giving and would be helpful for others to view
4 votesWould you give them access to all of the metrics? Do they need any filtering or can they have the same view as you?
-
Give the choice to cc secondary contact in emails
In sending out emails to applicants, in most cases they are already going to the primary contact (grant writer, Dev Director, program mgr. etc.) And the ED or CEO is almost always the secondary contact. It seems silly for the drop-down option to be "cc primary contact"...when it should include the option of "cc secondary contact". We just completed our entire first GLM process, and have only now realized that we've not been cc'ing the ED of most organizations!! This puts the onus on the primary to share. And yes, I guess we should have been adding a cc to…
4 votes -
Application Start date in application drafts bucket
Often times we extend the application for only specific students (however, this can range from 50 ot more or less students). I do not know the names of the students since the school cannot divulge that information. I was hoping to look at the start date of their drafted application in order to identify the students I am extending the opportunity for based on the donors request. A start date in the drafted applications would be very helpful for this purpose.
4 votes -
Flagging Unsupported Characters
Members of my team spent hours on chat trying to troubleshoot why they could not upload files to organizational profiles while I could. The issue at hand was the use of an unsupported character in the file name... the system did not give us any indication of this, nor did support staff ask about the file name. We managed to figure it out on our own.
Would be great to either list unsupported characters in file upload spaces, or to have a pop up message when an unsupported character is preventing file upload.
3 votes -
Allowing a true count of students in a UA under the submitted bucket
When a student submits their General Application in the UA, you can only see a true number count by pulling a report. It would be helpful if those individual students would show up as submitted, since they have submitted a General Application. The drafted students shows correctly, but it shows 0 for submitted when that it not accurate. Right now they just get moved to the individual opportunity immediately instead of showing in the submitted bucket.
3 votes -
Multiple Evaluations in GLM
When looking at the overall process, the user is only allowed two evaluations per process. We have a unique situation where we have areas of community need and are looking to divide up the applications. We were hoping to add more evaluations to four (4) so we can create separate evaluations for a better experience for our reviewers. We were also hoping to create unique evaluations that are more in line with each application that comes through our process.
I am suggesting being able to add more evaluations in each process in case two is NOT enough for the process.
3 votes -
Real-Time Score Summation on Evaluation Forms
The Problem: Currently, evaluators can only see the total percentage on their dashboard after submission. While filling out a form, they have no way to see the cumulative raw score unless they calculate it manually. This adds unnecessary cognitive load and leads to "scoring blind," where evaluators aren't sure if their individual marks align with the final grade they intended to give.
The Solution: Add a "Total Score Counter" at the bottom of evaluation forms (or as a sticky header/footer). This counter should update in real-time as the evaluator selects scores for individual questions.
Key Benefits:
Accuracy: Evaluators can immediately…
3 votes -
Automated Scoring
We receive approximately 600 applicants through our universal application each cycle. It would be great if certain components of the application could be automatically scored such as GPA or SAI from FAFSA.
Automating these purely objective metrics would significantly reduce the time burden on reviewers and administrators. Most important to me is minimizing the need for follow-up corrections due to scoring inconsistencies.
3 votes
.png){kind=link}
- Don't see your idea?