Skip to content

GLM & SLM Idea Lab

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

2053 results found

  1. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Make Applicant role an option for Grants Managers

    Current: the Applicant role is not available for Grants Managers. Grants Managers often want to see the application exactly as an applicant would, especially before we do outreach.

    Desired: Applicant role is an option we can select for Grants Managers

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Google Docs

    My company switched from Microsoft Office products to Google in December 2019. I have been able to manage most processes with GLM without an issue, but cannot update merge templates using Google Docs (even though we can edit documents in .docx format in Google). I downloaded the original merge template file from GLM, uploaded it to Google Drive as a .docx format, made a few changes, and downloaded the updated version in Word Document format, but when I add the updated merge template and try to create a document with it in GLM the merge fields do not work even…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Auto-populate third party responses

    I think it would be very helpful if repeating information in third party responses could somehow auto-populate with previously entered information (e.g. Responder's name, contact info etc.).

    Our third party response's contain a lot of duplicated/repeating information so this would make it a lot easier and faster for responders completing multiple requests.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Make all evaluators accessible via Assign Evaluators regardless of process

    Current situation: administrators must add evaluators through the Process Manager so they are available to be assigned

    Desired situation: as evaluator accounts are added, they are added automatically to every process to make them available to Grants Managers immediately

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Include email responses in Contact email history

    The contact email history would be a much better tool if it included all correspondence with the applicants. Only being able to view emails sent to the applicant and not seeing responses makes it an incomplete history.

    28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Limit the WalkMe training options to those tasks available to the user's assigned role

    The WalkMe training is great but it assumes full administrator access. Most of our trainees are grants managers. This causes a mismatch between what the training is walking them through and what the trainee sees on the screen.

    Current situation: Trainees see tasks in WalkMe that they are restricted from using based on role.

    Desired situation: WalkMe training only shows modules that correspond with the available activities based on role

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Present "E-mail Primary Contact" on Request Summary page

    When on the Request Summary page, a few extra clicks are needed to e-mail the primary contact; either going to the orgs contact page or clicking for more detail, such as the request detail page or follow ups page Present that button on every instance of the Request Summary page.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. evaluator scores

    On our 2 stage processes, it would be nice if evaluators could see their scores from the previous LOI evaluation when scoring in the application phase.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. add to calendar

    Create an "add to calendar?" option for any due date (app/follow up forms, etc) whether from the dashboard or within an automatic email. This would be really helpful for applicants who are managing multiple grant processes that are in several stages.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Merge duplicate users

    Hi! I'd like to be able to merge GLM users like we can with organizations. Sometimes it is created in error, either administratively or by the user. We'd like to be able to merge the data into one.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. SLM - comments in Evaluation form be searchabl

    Have comments in Evaluation form be searchable -- so often you remember writing something about a student but not the student name!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. eval 2 closed app

    This issue happens in both GLM and SLM. I consider it a CRITICAL priority issue for SLM. Users assigned Eval 2 permissions (to record decisions in application evaluation) have view capabilities to see ALL CLOSED EVALS REGARDLESS OF PROCESS.

    This is a frightening case in SLM when you have data of students from multiple school districts all in different processes, but every Eval 2 user can see their application when the app is in Closed Eval status.

    Applications in SLM have personal data (home address, phone number, email, potentially social security numbers, SAT scores, high school or college transcripts, etc.)…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Option to turn off adding administrators or grants managers to existing email notifications

    We are having new (or updated) administrators and grants managers appear automatically on email notifications. This is NOT helpful. We want to be able to designate which admins or other internal staff receive email notifications. An example is the submission notification email for a grant application - we need to edit the list anytime we add or change the permissions of staff.

    Desired behavior: Have the automatic addition of administrators/grants managers be an option that we can toggle on and off

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Email  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Rules for Questions (beyond character limits)

    It would be cool to have the option of certain "rules" for form questions.

    For example, if the max dollar amount that an applicant can request for a grant is $2,000 set up a rule for the question that values above $2,000 will get an error message or not permit an applicant to complete that question.

    Right now character limits and instructions are the best way to achieve that, but some applicants still bypass the instructions so a "rule" for a number range limit would be a great addition.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Non Paid Organizations

    Is it possible to generate a quick list for all my non-paid organizations within a certain time frame? The Reporting and data sets is way to cumbersome to achieve this easily.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Follow-Up Form Automatic Staff Notification

    When creating follow-ups in the system, it would be helpful if the system did not automatically select the options to inform all organizational staff when forms are submitted. It would be easiest if there was a system-wide setting to pre-select who will receive notifications, rather than having to remember to uncheck all staff members when creating a follow-up form.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. archive abandoned and denied requests

    Allow us to archive abandoned and denied requests to keep our search results and dashboards clean

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Organization Relationship Field

    Add a field so that history between the non-profit and the foundation can be recorded for future generations of board members to the foundation. The field would be an internal field to be recorded by the foundation and not viewable by the non-profit. This relationship field could then be pulled into the printed/online proposals as a merge field for educational purposes. For example, we helped start this non-profit back in 1975!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed Idea  ·  0 comments  ·  CRM  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Branching within question groups (branched groups & individual questions)

    Allow for both branched whole question groups and individual questions.

    Our application has many questions within each section that could be branched, but it gets confusing to have to redirect applicants to a new section. It would be great to be able to have branched questions right within that question group/section so that all the same type of information stays under the same heading, but applicants are not having to wade through loads of "If Yes..." type questions that don't apply to them.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base