850 results found
-
Evaluators Viewing Average Score Page
It would benefit if evaluators can view the average score page, like an administrator has access to. Currently each evaluator has to drill into each application to view the average score. And if you have 20-50 applications to review, it is frustrating and time consuming to come up with the average score for each application. Viewing the application Evaluation page listing all applications and their average scoring would be helpful.
6 votes -
Email Templates - ability to bold/underline/italics
We would really like to have the rich text editor also available for the email templates. We would like to be able to underline/bold/italics/bullet points/etc for emails that are automated from the system.
We will often bypass sending an auto email to instead spend the work doing them individually specifically because we cannot add emphasis in the text. Please consider adding this functionality!
6 votes -
Batch Build and Edit Committees
Building review committees is time consuming and burdensome. Our list of 130+ volunteer committee participants changes annually. It takes MANY hours to select each existing committee in the universe, review and compare to an existing list for the changes and individually add new members, delete old ones, and build new profiles for net new participant. Building new profiles is also challenging since it can't be done on the committee building page so one needs to navigate to a separate window taking the steps to build a new profile and assign a password (yet another extra step).
It would save many…
5 votes -
Randomly Assign Evaluators
In our process each applicant receives at least three reviews from three different evaluators. It would be nice if I could randomly assign evaluators to the applicants. I currently do this by creating an excel file with the applicants on the vertical axis and the evaluators on the horizontal. I assign each applicant a number and use a random number generator to assign the applications each reviewer is expected to review. To be able to do this quickly within the GLM system would be great. I know some of the competitors provide this option.
5 votes -
run report on who modified a form
It would be helpful if we could run a report on who the last person was to modify a form. For example, if an admin prints follow ups and marks them complete, it would be great to see who marked it complete if we have multi staff working in the follow up stages.
5 votes -
Choose a specific date for a follow up form to be assigned
Please provide the option to allow us to manually key in a date for when the follow up form is to be assigned. Where the applicant cannot see the follow up form when they logon and to not allow the applicant to receive any emails regarding the follow up form until the date that the follow up form is assigned. It’s very rare to have down time but when there is any, we can begin to assign follow up forms with a future assignment date.
5 votes -
Integration of Multi-fund Detail
When sending letters to grantees, I like to let them know which funds their grant came from. We do a lot of multi-fund grants and so I'd like to have each fund and amount listed. Sometimes there are multiple installments from one fund, so I don't want to pull in installment fields. To my understanding, I can only get this information into a merge template if I create custom fields in a form attached to the request (like the approval form) and manually enter them. This is a more tedious than I'd like. It would be great if this information…
5 votes -
Export Form Questions via Reports
Would like a way to export the questions that are asked in Application, Evaluation, Follow Up forms via the Reporting function. This would be used to compare questions that are asked across different processes.
5 votes -
GLM: notifying organization of existing profile with GLM
To avoid multiple GLM profiles for one organization it would be great to add a feature notifying the person that the EIN entered when creating an account is already in use and restrict them from creating another account. If it is a fiscally sponsored organization then the 00-000000 option can still be available.
5 votes -
Preview Application Form
Please add back the live form preview option on the new user dashboard rather than just the PDF option.
5 votes -
Add "Request Amount" into "Organization Request Summary" Merge Table
This one has been previously archived, but when we get the summary of an organization, we really really would like to see the amount they requested, even if their grant was denied. This is one area where Blackbaud allowed us more functionality than Foundant.
Along the same lines, when you look at org request history, it would be nice if it showed amount requested in the summary at a glance.
5 votes -
Evaluator batch print function
Someone else has already asked to add batch printing to the Evaluations stage, but we really need it to go one further, and to allow Evaluators to batch print for themselves. This is the number one thing all our Evaluators, many of whom are reading over a 100 applications at a time, have been asking for for the last several years, and when we switched to Foundant, we had thought we were giving them that, only to find out after the fact that we misunderstood, and they still have to download one pdf at a time. Adding batch printing to…
5 votes -
Add CSuite Fund Name to GLM Csuite field options
Currently, when building a form in GLM it allows us to sync certain CSuite fields from the grant. We would like to be able to sync the Fund Name from CSuite to GLM.
5 votes -
Downloads should have unique names
Every download has the same name. It is confusing when you're downloading many different applications/evals/etc for internal archiving. The downloaded file needs the process name and the applicant name and year when I download. I just end up with ApplicationPacket (1), ApplicationPacket (2), etc., I have to rename every single file one by one so I don't lose track of which is which.
5 votes -
Bulk Copy Applications
At BACF we have 11 different committees that review applications based on their funding alignment. Our current process is running a universal application. We then create individual processes for each of our committees, and manually copy applications into the processes for the committees that will review it. For example, we may get a funding request from the American Red Cross that has funding alignment across 3 different committees. I would then manually copy that request into each of the three processes for those committees to review.
Where this becomes cumbersome is that I have to go into each application individually…
5 votes -
comment
We would love if in the comment section you can add a date, not just have it default to the date it was added. We might go in once a week and add all the emails and comments, but it will only put in the date we enter it. AND if we edit it, it gives a new date, not the one it was created on.
Wouldn't hurt if we could attach a document to a comment :)
5 votes -
View Organization History
Under the View Organization History system setting, it would be helpful to have an option of "Organization-by-Organization". Right now there are three options 1)All, 2)None, 3) User-by-user. It would be helpful to have it an option for Organization-by-Organization for those orgs who have the same EIN# but separate local chapters (or schools, in the case of a school district). For these type of applicants, we only want them to see their own chapter's information; but for all the rest of our nonprofit applicants, with the high turnover of NPO staff, it's helpful for them to see their entire organizational history.
5 votes -
Duplicating questions
Please can we have the ability to duplicate a question? It would make it so much faster!
5 votes -
Direct Link to Application
Is there a way to get direct links to processes/applications to share with grantees?
5 votes -
Batch Edit Report Deadlines
We typically have multiple organizations who miss the deadlines for our grant reports. We would like to be able to batch edit deadlines for those reports so we can more quickly make them available for completion and don't have to go into each report to edit individually.
5 votes
- Don't see your idea?